Criminal Code (Canada)
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)(Learn how and when to remove this template message)
|Parliament of Canada|
|Citation||RSC 1985, c C-46|
|Enacted by||Parliament of Canada|
|Enacted||First enacted: SC 1892, c 29; carried forward in statute revisions, RSC 1906, c 146 and RSC 1927, c 36; substantially revised and re-enacted, SC 1953-54, c 51; carried forward in statute revisions, RSC 1970, c C-34 and RSC 1985, c C-46|
The Criminal Code (French: Code criminel) is a law that codifies most criminal offences and procedures in Canada. Its official long title is An Act respecting the criminal law (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, as amended). Section 91(27) of the Constitution Act, 1867 establishes the sole jurisdiction of Parliament over criminal law in Canada.
The Criminal Code contains some defences, but most are part of the common law rather than statute. Important Canadian criminal laws not forming part of the code include the Firearms Act, the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, the Canada Evidence Act, the Food and Drugs Act, the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the Contraventions Act.
One of the conveniences of the Criminal Code was that it constituted the principle that no person would be able to be convicted of a crime unless otherwise specifically outlined and stated in a statute. This legal document has played a major part in Canada's history and has also helped form other legal acts and laws, for example, the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act.
Structure [ edit ]
The main body of the Criminal Code is divided into the following major components. In these major sections, there are many subsections that help to accurately layout the law:
- Part I – General
- Part II – Offences Against Public Order
- Part II.1 – Terrorism
- Part III – Firearms and Other Weapons
- Part IV – Offences Against the Administration of Law and Justice
- Part V – Sexual Offences, Public Morals and Disorderly Conduct
- Part VI – Invasion of Privacy
- Part VII – Disorderly Houses, Gaming and Betting
- Part VIII – Offences Against the Person and Reputation
- Part VIII.1 - Offences Relating to Conveyances
- Part IX – Offences Against Rights of Property
- Part X – Fraudulent Transactions Relating to Contracts and Trade
- Part XI – Wilful and Forbidden Acts in Respect of Certain Property
- Part XII – Offences Relating to Currency
- Part XII.2 – Proceeds of Crime
- Part XIII – Attempts-Conspiracies-Accessories
- Part XIV – Jurisdiction
- Part XV – Special Procedure and Powers
- Part XVI – Compelling Appearance of an Accused Before a Justice and Interim Release
- Part XVII – Language of Accused
- Part XVIII – Procedure on Preliminary Inquiry
- Part XVIII.1 - Case Management Judge
- Part XIX – Indictable Offences-Trial Without a Jury
- Part XIX.1 – Nunavut Court of Justice
- Part XX – Procedure in Jury Trials and General Provisions
- Part XX.1 – Mental Disorder
- Part XXI – Appeals-Indictable Offences
- Part XXI.1 – Applications for Ministerial Review-Miscarriages of Justice
- Part XXII – Procuring Attendance
- Part XXII.1 - Remediation Agreements
- Part XXIII – Sentencing
- Part XXIV – Dangerous Offenders and Long-Term Offenders
- Part XXV – Effect and Enforcement of Recognizances
- Part XXVI – Extraordinary Remedies
- Part XXVII – Summary Convictions
- Part XXVIII – Miscellaneous
The Criminal Code also includes the descriptions of each drug and what schedule it is. This extension helps to determine the severity of the drug and the length of punishment when caught with the drug. It also distinguishes what amount is considered for personal consumption and what amount is considered meant for trafficking. It also includes the different layouts for warrants so that people can familiarize themselves with the form of warrant that the police should have with them depending on the type of search they are conducting. However, the majority of the public may not take the time to view the different warrants, the government has to provide them so that people can refer to them if ever to come in contact with a warrant.
History and evolution [ edit ]
The Criminal Code of Canada stems from a long history of legal documents. The following documents play a part in the construction and changes brought on the Criminal Code:
|The Criminal Code, 1892, S.C. 1892, c. 29||July 1, 1893||Sponsored by Minister of Justice Sir John Sparrow David Thompson, it was based on the "Stephen Code", written by Sir James Fitzjames Stephen for a Royal Commission in England in 1879, and subsequently modified by Canadian jurist George Burbidge to address the Canadian context. Its significant provisions included:
|An Act respecting Arrest, Trial and Imprisonment of Youthful Offenders, S.C. 1894, c. 58||July 23, 1894||Provided for the separation of juvenile offenders from older persons and habitual criminals during arrest, confinement, trial and subsequent imprisonment, as well as integrating efforts with those of children's aid organizations being organized by the provinces.|
|The Juvenile Delinquents Act, 1908, S.C. 1908, c. 40||Implemented over time by specific proclamations, with respect to a specified province or a portion thereof.||The Juvenile Delinquents Act was designed to operate in a similar manner to the Probation of Offenders Act 1907 passed by the British Parliament in the previous year, as well as the juvenile delinquent provisions contained in the later Children Act 1908.
While the minimum age for those subject to the Act remained at seven years, the maximum age varied by province. By 1982, it was set at 16 in six provinces, 17 for British Columbia and Newfoundland, and 18 for Quebec and Manitoba.
|Criminal Code, S.C. 1953-54, c. 51||April 1, 1955||Reenactment of the Code, with modernization of provisions. It abolished all common law offences (other than for contempt of court), as well as any offences created by the British Parliament or in effect under an Act or ordinance in any place before becoming part of Canada.|
|Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1968–69, S.C. 1968–69, c. 38||Various, from July 1, 1969 to January 1, 1970||An omnibus bill promoted by Pierre Elliott Trudeau, the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1968–69 provided for the decriminalization of homosexual acts between consenting adults, the legalization of abortion, contraception and lotteries, new gun ownership restrictions as well as the authorization of breathalyzer tests on suspected drunk drivers.|
|Young Offenders Act, S.C. 1980-81-82-83, c. 110||April 2, 1984.||The Young Offenders Act raised the minimum age of criminal responsibility to 12 years, and standardized the maximum age to 16–18 years (depending on the province), as well as setting limits on the length of sentence that could be imposed.|
|Anti-terrorism Act, S.C. 2001, c. 41||December 24, 2001 (principally)||Enacted in response to the terrorist attack against the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, the Anti-Terrorism Act included provisions regarding the financing of terrorism, the establishment of a list of terrorist entities, the freezing of property, the forfeiture of property, and participating, facilitating, instructing and harbouring of terrorism.|
|Youth Criminal Justice Act, S.C. 2002, c. 1||April 1, 2003||The Youth Criminal Justice Act was passed to address concerns raised by the effects of the Young Offenders Act.|
Case Studies [ edit ]
There are many case studies out on the Criminal Code, however, there are only five that have been used by the government to analyse the document itself. Each of the case studies focuses on a different area of the Criminal Code. In the case study of Corletta, she is faced with a person who continues to criminally harass her and once he is charged continues the harassment. However, once the time for trial comes, he pleads guilty and gets a one year intermittent sentence. She does not feel this is enough, however, she is unable to do anything as she did not have the proof that he harassed her after his initial arrest (one of the two key factors for his sentence). Therefore, the fact that she was unable to come forward with new evidence that he continued after the initial arrest, he was unable to receive the possible treatment that he may have needed to avoid another incident from occurring. The other four case studies deal with harassment by a known stranger, a partner, a customer, and an anonymous stranger. (For further on the other four cases refer to A review of section 264 (criminal harassment) of the Criminal Code of Canada).
See also [ edit ]
Notes [ edit ]
References [ edit ]
- The citation of this Act by this short title is authorised by the English text of section 1 of this Act.
- The citation of this Act by this short title is authorised by the French text of section 1 of this Act.
- "1892, Canada's Criminal Code". Duhaime.org – Learn Law. Retrieved 2016-09-19.
- 1892 Code, s. 5
- 1892 Code, ss. 9–10
- 1908 Act, s. 36
- Robin, Laura (26 May 1982). "Laws affecting young to change". Ottawa Citizen. p. 47.
- An Act to amend the Criminal Code, S.C. 1955, c. 2
- 1953-54 Act, ss. 7–8
- Young Offenders Act: Proclaimed in force April 2, 1984, SI/84-56
- [http://www.canadagazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2002/2002-01-02/pdf/g2-13601.pdf Order Fixing December 24, 2001 as the Date of the Coming into Force of Certain Sections of the Act], SI/2002-16
- [http://www.canadagazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2002/2002-06-19/pdf/g2-13613.pdf Order Fixing April 1, 2003 as the Date of the Coming into Force of the Act], SI/2002-91