Wikipedia

English Reformation

The English Reformation was a series of events in 16th-century England by which the Church of England broke away from the authority of the Pope and the Roman Catholic Church. These events were, in part, associated with the wider European Protestant Reformation, a religious and political movement that affected the practice of Christianity across western and central Europe. Causes included the decline of feudalism and the rise of nationalism, the rise of the common law, the invention of the printing press and increased circulation of the Bible, and the transmission of new knowledge and ideas among scholars, the upper and middle classes and readers in general. However, the various phases of the English Reformation, which also covered Wales and Ireland, were largely driven by changes in government policy, to which public opinion gradually accommodated itself.

Based on Henry VIII's desire for an annulment of his marriage (first requested of Pope Clement VII in 1527), the English Reformation was at the outset more of a political affair than a theological dispute. The reality of political differences between Rome and England allowed growing theological disputes to come to the fore.[1] Until the break with Rome, it was the Pope and general councils of the church that decided doctrine. Church law was governed by canon law with final jurisdiction in Rome. Church taxes were paid straight to Rome, and the Pope had the final word in the appointment of bishops.

The break with Rome was effected by a series of acts of Parliament passed between 1532 and 1534, among them the 1534 Act of Supremacy, which declared that Henry was the "Supreme Head on earth of the Church of England".[2] (This title was renounced by Mary I in 1553 in the process of restoring papal jurisdiction; when Elizabeth I reasserted the royal supremacy in 1559, her title was Supreme Governor.)[2] Final authority in doctrinal and legal disputes now rested with the monarch, and the papacy was deprived of revenue and the final say on the appointment of bishops.

The theology and liturgy of the Church of England became markedly Protestant during the reign of Henry's son Edward VI, largely along lines laid down by Archbishop Thomas Cranmer. Under Mary, the whole process was reversed and the Church of England was again placed under papal jurisdiction. Soon after, Elizabeth reintroduced the Protestant faith but in a more moderate manner. The structure and theology of the church was a matter of fierce dispute for generations.

The violent aspect of these disputes, manifested in the English Civil Wars, ended when the last Roman Catholic monarch, James II, was deposed, and Parliament asked William III and Mary II to rule jointly in conjunction with the English Bill of Rights in 1688 (in the "Glorious Revolution"), from which emerged a church polity with an established church and a number of non-conformist churches whose members at first suffered various civil disabilities that were removed over time. The legacy of the previous Roman Catholic heritage and establishment as the state church remained an issue for some time and still exists today. A substantial but dwindling minority from the late 16th to early 19th centuries remained Roman Catholic in England. Their church organisation remained illegal until the Relief Act of 1829.

Early reform movements [ edit ]

The Reformation was a clash of two opposed schemes of salvation. The Catholic Church taught that the contrite person could cooperate with God towards their salvation by performing good works.[3] Medieval Catholic worship was centred on the Mass, the church's offering of the sacrifice of Christ's body and blood. The Mass was also an offering of prayer by which the living could help souls in purgatory.[4] Protestants taught that fallen humanity was helpless and under condemnation until given the grace of God through faith.[3] They believed the Catholic emphasis on purgatory was an obstacle to true faith in God and the identification of the Mass with Christ's sacrifice a blasphemous perversion of the Eucharist.[5][6] In place of the Mass, Protestant worship was centred on the Bible–to them the only road to faith in Christ–either read or presented in sermons.[5]

Lollardy anticipated some Protestant teachings. Derived from the writings of John Wycliffe, a 14th-century theologian and Bible translator, Lollardy stressed the primacy of scripture and emphasised preaching over the sacrament of the altar, holding the latter to be but a memorial.[7][8] Unlike Protestants, the early Lollards lacked access to the printing press and failed to gain a foothold among the church's most popular communicators, the friars. Unable to gain access to the levers of power, the Lollards were much reduced in numbers and influence by the 15th century. They sometimes faced investigation and persecution and rarely produced new literature after 1450.[9] Lollards could still be found—especially in London and the Thames Valley, in Essex and Kent, Coventry, Bristol and even in the North—and many would be receptive to Protestant ideas.[10][page needed]

More respectable and orthodox calls for reform came from Renaissance humanists, such as Erasmus (who lived in England for a time), John Colet, Dean of St Paul's, and Thomas More. Humanists downplayed the role of rites and ceremonies in achieving salvation and criticised the superstitious veneration of relics. Erasmus and Colet emphasised a simple, personal piety and a return ad fontes ("back to the sources") of Christian faith—the scriptures as understood through textual and linguistic scholarship.[11] Colet's commentaries on the Pauline epistles emphasized double predestination and the worthlessness of human works. Anne Boleyn's own religious views were shaped by French humanists such as Jacques Lefèvre d'Étaples, whose 1512 commentaries on Paul's epistles stated that human works were irrelevant to salvation five years before Luther published the same views.[12][13]

Humanist scholarship provided arguments against papal primacy and support for the claim that popes had usurped powers that rightfully belonged to kings. In 1534, Lorenzo Valla's On the Donation of Constantine—which proved that one of the pillars of the papacy's temporal authority was a hoax—was published in London. Thomas Cromwell paid for an English translation of Marsiglio of Padua's Defensor pacis in 1535. The conservative cleric Stephen Gardiner used Marsiglio's theory of a unitary realm to defend royal power over spiritual as well as secular affairs.[14]

By the early 1520s, the views of German reformer Martin Luther were known and disputed in England.[15] The main plank of Luther's theology was justification by faith alone rather than by good works. In this view, only faith, itself a gift from God, can secure the grace of God. Justification by faith alone threatened the whole basis of the Roman Catholic penitential system with its doctrine of purgatory, prayer for the dead, indulgences, and the sacrificial character of the Mass.[16][17] Early Protestants portrayed Catholic practices such as confession to priests, clerical celibacy, and requirements to fast and keep vows as burdensome and spiritually oppressive. Not only did purgatory lack any biblical basis according to Protestants, but the clergy were accused of using fear of purgatory to make money from prayers and masses. Catholics countered that justification by faith alone was a "licence to sin".[18]

English Catholicism was strong and popular in the early 1500s, and those who held Protestant sympathies would remain a religious minority until political events intervened.[19] Protestant ideas were popular among some parts of the English population, especially among academics and merchants with connections to continental Europe.[20] The first open demonstration of support for Luther took place at Cambridge in 1521 when a student defaced a copy of the papal bull of condemnation against Luther.[21] Also at Cambridge was a group of reform-minded university students that met at the White Horse tavern from the mid-1520s, known by the moniker "Little Germany". Its members included Robert Barnes, Hugh Latimer, John Frith, Thomas Bilney, George Joye and Thomas Arthur.[22]

The Tyndale Bible was the basis for later English translations.

The publication of William Tyndale's English New Testament in 1526 helped to spread Protestant ideas. Printed abroad and smuggled into the country, the Tyndale Bible was the first English Bible to be mass produced; there were probably 16,000 copies in England by 1536. Tyndale's translation was highly influential, forming the basis of all later English translations.[23] An attack on traditional religion, Tyndale's translation included an epilogue explaining Luther's theology of justification by faith, and many translation choices were designed to undermine traditional Catholic teachings. Tyndale translated the Greek word charis as favour rather than grace to de-emphasize the role of grace-giving sacraments. His choice of love rather than charity to translate agape de-emphasized good works. When rendering the Greek verb metanoeite into English, Tyndale used repent rather than do penance. The former word indicated an internal turning to God, while the latter translation supported the sacrament of confession.[24]

Between 1530 and 1533, Thomas Hitton (England's first Protestant martyr), Thomas Bilney, Richard Bayfield, John Tewkesbury, James Bainham, Thomas Benet, Thomas Harding, John Frith and Andrew Hewet were burned to death.[25] In 1531, William Tracy was posthumously convicted of heresy for denying purgatory and affirming justification by faith, and his corpse was disinterred and burned.[26] While Protestants were only a small portion of the population and suffered persecution, the rift between the king and papacy in the 1530s gave Protestants opportunities to form new alliances with government officials.[27]

Henrician Reformation [ edit ]

Annulment controversy [ edit ]

Catherine of Aragon, Henry VIII's first wife. Attributed to Joannes Corvus, National Portrait Gallery, London.

Henry VIII acceded to the English throne in 1509 at the age of 17. He made a dynastic marriage with Catherine of Aragon, widow of his brother Arthur, in June 1509, just before his coronation on Midsummer's Day. Unlike his father, who was secretive and conservative, the young Henry appeared the epitome of chivalry and sociability. An observant Roman Catholic, he heard up to five masses a day (except during the hunting season); of "powerful but unoriginal mind", he let himself be influenced by his advisors from whom he was never apart, by night or day. He was thus susceptible to whoever had his ear.[28]

This contributed to a state of hostility between his young contemporaries and the Lord Chancellor, Cardinal Thomas Wolsey. As long as Wolsey had his ear, Henry's Roman Catholicism was secure: in 1521, he had defended the Roman Catholic Church from Martin Luther's accusations of heresy in a book he wrote—probably with considerable help from the conservative Bishop of Rochester John Fisher[29]—entitled The Defence of the Seven Sacraments, for which he was awarded the title "Defender of the Faith" (Fidei Defensor) by Pope Leo X. (Successive English and British monarchs have retained this title to the present, even after the Anglican Church broke away from Roman Catholicism, in part because the title was re-conferred by Parliament in 1544, after the split.) Wolsey's enemies at court included those who had been influenced by Lutheran ideas,[30] among whom was the attractive, charismatic Anne Boleyn.

Anne arrived at court in 1522 as maid of honour to Queen Catherine, having spent some years in France being educated by Queen Claude of France. She was a woman of "charm, style and wit, with will and savagery which made her a match for Henry".[31] Anne was a distinguished French conversationalist, singer, and dancer. She was cultured and is the disputed author of several songs and poems.[32] By 1527, Henry wanted his marriage to Catherine annulled.[33] She had not produced a male heir who survived longer than two months, and Henry wanted a son to secure the Tudor dynasty. Before Henry's father (Henry VII) ascended the throne, England had been beset by civil warfare over rival claims to the English crown. Henry wanted to avoid a similar uncertainty over the succession.[34] Catherine of Aragon's only surviving child was Princess Mary.

Anne Boleyn, Henry VIII's second wife, by an unknown artist. National Portrait Gallery, London.

Henry claimed that this lack of a male heir was because his marriage was "blighted in the eyes of God".[35] Catherine had been his late brother's wife, and it was therefore against biblical teachings for Henry to have married her (Leviticus 20:21); a special dispensation from Pope Julius II had been needed to allow the wedding in the first place.[36] Henry argued the marriage was never valid because the biblical prohibition was part of unbreakable divine law, and even popes could not dispense with it.[37] In 1527, Henry asked Pope Clement VII to annul the marriage, but the Pope refused. According to canon law, the pope could not annul a marriage on the basis of a canonical impediment previously dispensed. Clement also feared the wrath of Catherine's nephew, Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, whose troops earlier that year had sacked Rome and briefly taken the Pope prisoner.[38]

The combination of his "scruple of conscience" and his captivation by Anne Boleyn made his desire to rid himself of his Queen compelling.[39] The indictment of his chancellor Cardinal Wolsey in 1529 for praemunire (taking the authority of the papacy above the Crown), and subsequent death in November 1530 on his way to London to answer a charge of high treason left Henry open to the opposing influences of the supporters of the Queen and those who sanctioned the abandonment of the Roman allegiance, for whom an annulment was but an opportunity.[40]

Parliamentary debate and legislation [ edit ]

In 1529, the King summoned Parliament to deal with annulment, thus bringing together those who wanted reform but who disagreed what form it should take; it became known as the Reformation Parliament. There were common lawyers who resented the privileges of the clergy to summon laity to their courts;[41] there were those who had been influenced by Lutheranism and were hostile to the theology of Rome; Thomas Cromwell was both. Henry's chancellor, Thomas More, successor to Wolsey, also wanted reform: he wanted new laws against heresy.[42]

Thomas Cromwell, 1st Earl of Essex (c. 1485–1540), Henry VIII's chief minister 1532–40.

Cromwell was a lawyer and a member of Parliament—a Protestant who saw how Parliament could be used to advance the Royal Supremacy, which Henry wanted, and to further Protestant beliefs and practices Cromwell and his friends wanted.[43] One of his closest friends was Thomas Cranmer, soon to be made an archbishop.

In the matter of the annulment, no progress seemed possible. The Pope seemed more afraid of Emperor Charles V than of Henry. Anne and Cromwell and their allies wished simply to ignore the Pope, but in October 1530 a meeting of clergy and lawyers advised that Parliament could not empower the archbishop to act against the Pope's prohibition. Henry thus resolved to bully the priests.[44]

Actions against clergy [ edit ]

Having brought down his chancellor, Cardinal Wolsey, Henry VIII finally resolved to charge the whole English clergy with praemunire to secure their agreement to his annulment. The Statute of Praemunire, which forbade obedience to the authority of the Pope or of any foreign rulers, enacted in 1392, had been used against individuals in the ordinary course of court proceedings. Now Henry, having first charged Queen Catherine's supporters, Bishops John Fisher, Nicholas West and Henry Standish and Archdeacon of Exeter, Adam Travers, decided to proceed against the whole clergy.[45] Henry claimed £100,000 from the Convocation of Canterbury (a representative body of English clergy) for their pardon, which was granted by the Convocation on 24 January 1531. The clergy wanted the payment spread over five years, but Henry refused. The convocation responded by withdrawing their payment altogether and demanded Henry fulfil certain guarantees before they would give him the money. Henry refused these conditions. He agreed only to the five-year period of payment and added five articles that specified that:

  1. The clergy recognise Henry as the "sole protector and Supreme Head of the Church and clergy of England".[46]
  2. The King had spiritual jurisdiction
  3. The privileges of the church were upheld only if they did not detract from the royal prerogative and the laws of the realm
  4. The King pardoned the clergy for violating the statute of praemunire, and
  5. The laity were also pardoned.

In Parliament, Bishop Fisher championed Catherine and the clergy; he had inserted into the first article the phrase "as far as the word of God allows".[47][48][page needed] In Convocation, however, William Warham, Archbishop of Canterbury, requested a discussion but was met by a stunned silence; then Warham said, "He who is silent seems to consent", to which a clergyman responded, "Then we are all silent." The Convocation granted consent to the King's five articles and the payment on 8 March 1531. That same year, Parliament passed the Pardon to Clergy Act 1531.

Royal supremacy [ edit ]

The breaking of the power of Rome proceeded little by little. In 1532, Cromwell brought before Parliament the Supplication Against the Ordinaries, which listed nine grievances against the church, including abuses of power and Convocation's independent legislative power. Finally, on 10 May, the King demanded of Convocation that the church renounce all authority to make laws. On 15 May, the Submission of the Clergy was subscribed, which recognised Royal Supremacy over the church so that it could no longer make canon law without royal licence—i.e., without the King's permission—thus emasculating it as a law-making body. (Parliament subsequently passed this in 1534 and again in 1536.) The day after this, More resigned as chancellor, leaving Cromwell as Henry's chief minister. (Cromwell never became chancellor. His power came—and was lost—through his informal relations with Henry.)

Several acts of Parliament then followed. The Act in Conditional Restraint of Annates proposed that the clergy pay no more than 5 percent of their first year's revenue (annates) to Rome. This was initially controversial and required that Henry visit the House of Lords three times to browbeat the Commons.[49][original research?]

Thomas More, with John Fisher the leader of political resistance against the break with Rome. Both were executed in 1535.

The Act in Restraint of Appeals, drafted by Cromwell, apart from outlawing appeals to Rome on ecclesiastical matters, declared that

This realm of England is an Empire, and so hath been accepted in the world, governed by one Supreme Head and King having the dignity and royal estate of the Imperial Crown of the same, unto whom a body politic compact of all sorts and degrees of people divided in terms and by names of Spirituality and Temporality, be bounden and owe to bear next to God a natural and humble obedience.[50]

This declared England an independent country in every respect. English historian Geoffrey Elton called this act an "essential ingredient" of the "Tudor revolution" in that it expounded a theory of national sovereignty.[51] The Act in Absolute Restraint of Annates outlawed all annates to Rome and also ordered that if cathedrals refused the King's nomination for bishop, they would be liable to punishment by praemunire. Finally in 1534, the Acts of Supremacy made Henry "supreme head in earth of the Church of England" and disregarded any "usage, custom, foreign laws, foreign authority [or] prescription".[52]

Meanwhile, having taken Anne to France on a pre-nuptial honeymoon, Henry married her in Westminster Abbey in January 1533. This was made easier by the death of Archbishop Warham, a strong opponent of an annulment. Henry appointed Thomas Cranmer to succeed him as Archbishop of Canterbury. Cranmer was prepared to grant the annulment of the marriage to Catherine as Henry required, going so far as to pronounce the judgment that Henry's marriage with Catherine was against the law of God on 23 May.[53] Anne gave birth to a daughter, Princess Elizabeth, in September 1533. The Pope responded to the marriage by excommunicating both Henry and Cranmer from the Roman Catholic Church (11 July 1533).[54] Henry was excommunicated again in December 1538.

Consequently, in the same year the Act of First Fruits and Tenths transferred the taxes on ecclesiastical income from the Pope to the Crown. The Act Concerning Peter's Pence and Dispensations outlawed the annual payment by landowners of one penny to the Pope. This Act also reiterated that England had "no superior under God, but only your Grace" and that Henry's "imperial crown" had been diminished by "the unreasonable and uncharitable usurpations and exactions" of the Pope.[55][page needed]

In case any of this should be resisted, Parliament passed the Treasons Act 1534, which made it high treason punishable by death to deny Royal Supremacy. The following year, Thomas More and John Fisher were executed under this legislation. Finally, in 1536, Parliament passed the Act against the Pope's Authority, which removed the last part of papal authority still legal. This was Rome's power in England to decide disputes concerning Scripture.

Moderate religious reform [ edit ]

Thomas Cranmer (1489–1556), Henry VIII's Archbishop of Canterbury and editor and co-author of the first and second Books of Common Prayer.

The break with Rome not only gave Henry VIII power to administer the English Church, to tax it, appoint its officials, and control its laws. It also gave him control over the church's doctrine and ritual.[56] Despite reading Protestant books, such as Simon Fish's Supplication for the Beggars and Tyndale's The Obedience of a Christian Man, and seeking Protestant support for his annulment,[57] Henry's religious views remained conservative. Nevertheless, to promote and defend the Royal Supremacy, he embraced the language of the continental Reformation all while maintaining a middle way between religious extremes. The King relied on men with Protestant sympathies, such as Thomas Cromwell and Thomas Cranmer, to carry out his religious programme.[58]

Since 1529, Cranmer had risen to prominence as part of the team working on the annulment. Having begun the task as a Catholic humanist, Cranmer's religious views had shifted toward Protestantism by 1531, in part due to the personal contacts made with continental reformers.[59] While on a diplomatic mission to Emperor Charles V in 1532, Cranmer visited Lutheran Nuremberg where he became friends with theologian Andreas Osiander. It was at this time that Cranmer became interested in Lutheranism, and he renounced his priestly vow of celibacy to secretly marry Osiander's niece.[60] The Lutherans, however, were not in favour of the annulment, forcing Cranmer and Henry to also seek support from other emerging Protestant churches in Germany and Switzerland. This brought him into contact with Martin Bucer of Strasbourg.[61] After Warham's death, Cranmer was made Archbishop of Canterbury (with papal consent) in 1533.[62]

In 1534, a new Heresy Act ensured that no one could be punished for speaking against the pope and also made it more difficult to convict someone of heresy; however, sacramentarians and Anabaptists continued to be vigorously persecuted.[63] What followed was a period of doctrinal confusion as both conservatives and reformers attempted to shape the church's future direction.[64] The reformers were aided by Cromwell, who in January 1535 was made vicegerent in spirituals. Effectively the King's vicar general, Cromwell's authority was greater than that of bishops, even the Archbishop of Canterbury.[65] Largely due to Anne Boleyn's influence, a number of Protestants were appointed bishops between 1534 and 1536. These included Latimer, Thomas Goodrich, John Salcot, Nicholas Shaxton, William Barlow, John Hilsey and Edward Foxe.[66] During the same period, the most influential conservative bishop, Stephen Gardiner, was sent to France on a diplomatic mission and thus removed from an active role in English politics for three years.[67]

Cromwell's programme, assisted by Anne Boleyn's influence over episcopal appointments, was not merely against the clergy and the power of Rome. He persuaded Henry that safety from political alliances that Rome might attempt to bring together lay in negotiations with the German Lutheran princes of the Schmalkaldic League.[68] There also seemed to be a possibility that Emperor Charles V might act to avenge his rejected aunt (Queen Catherine) and enforce the pope's excommunication. The negotiations did not lead to an alliance but did bring Lutheran ideas to England.[69]

In 1536, Convocation adopted the first doctrinal statement for the Church of England, the Ten Articles. This was followed by the Bishops' Book in 1537. These established a semi-Lutheran doctrine for the church. Justification by faith, qualified by an emphasis on good works following justification, was a core teaching. The traditional seven sacraments were reduced to three only—baptism, Eucharist and penance. Catholic teaching on praying to saints, purgatory and the use of images in worship was undermined.[70]

St Paul's Cross (in the lower left corner of the painting) was a prominent preaching cross on the grounds of Old St Paul's Cathedral.

In August 1536, the same month the Ten Articles were published, Cromwell issued a set of Royal Injunctions to the clergy. Minor feast days were changed into normal work days, including those celebrating a church's patron saint and most feasts during harvest time (July through September). The rationale was partly economic as too many holidays led to a loss of productivity and were "the occasion of vice and idleness".[71] In addition, Protestants considered feast days to be examples of superstition.[72] Clergy were to discourage pilgrimages and instruct the people to give to the poor rather than make offerings to images. The clergy were also ordered to place Bibles in both English and Latin in every church for the people to read.[73] This last requirement was largely ignored by the bishops for a year or more due the lack of any authorised English translation. The only complete vernacular version was the Coverdale Bible finished in 1535 and based on Tyndale's earlier work. It lacked royal approval, however.[74]

Historian Diarmaid MacCulloch in his study of The Later Reformation in England, 1547–1603 argues that after 1537, "England's Reformation was characterized by its hatred of images, as Margaret Aston's work on iconoclasm and iconophobia has repeatedly and eloquently demonstrated."[75] In February 1538, the famous Rood of Grace was condemned as a mechanical fraud and destroyed at St Paul's Cross. In July, the statues of Our Lady of Walsingham, Our Lady of Ipswich, and other Marian images were burned at Chelsea on Cromwell's orders. In September, Cromwell issued a second set of royal injunctions ordering the destruction of images to which pilgrimage offerings were made, the prohibition of lighting votive candles before images of saints, and the preaching of sermons against the veneration of images and relics.[76] Afterwards, the shrine and bones of Thomas Becket, considered by many to have been martyred in defense of the church's liberties, were destroyed at Canterbury Cathedral.[77]

Dissolution of the monasteries [ edit ]

Remains of Finchale Priory, a Benedictine monastery near Durham that was closed in 1535

For Cromwell and Cranmer, a step in the Protestant agenda was attacking monasticism, which was associated with the doctrine of purgatory.[78] While the King was not opposed to religious houses on theological grounds, there was concern over the loyalty of the monastic orders, which were international in character and resistant to the Royal Supremacy.[79] The Franciscan Observant houses were closed in August 1534 after that order refused to repudiate papal authority. Between 1535 and 1537, 18 Carthusians were killed for doing the same.[80]

The Crown was also experiencing financial difficulties, and the wealth of the church, in contrast to its political weakness, made confiscation of church property both tempting and feasible.[81] Seizure of monastic wealth was not unprecedented; it had happened before in 1295, 1337, and 1369.[78] The church owned between one-fifth and one-third of the land in all England; Cromwell realised that he could bind the gentry and nobility to Royal Supremacy by selling to them the huge amount of church lands, and that any reversion to pre-Royal Supremacy would entail upsetting many of the powerful people in the realm.[82]

In 1534, Cromwell initiated a visitation of the monasteries ostensibly to examine their character, but in fact, to value their assets with a view to expropriation.[81] The visiting commissioners claimed to have uncovered sexual immorality and financial impropriety amongst the monks and nuns, which became the ostensible justification for their suppression.[82] There were also reports of the possession and display of false relics, such as Hailes Abbey's vial of the Holy Blood, upon investigation announced to be "honey clarified and coloured with saffron".[83] The Compendium Competorum compiled by the visitors documented ten pieces of the True Cross, seven portions of the Virgin Mary's milk and numerous saints' girdles.[84]

Leading reformers, led by Anne Boleyn, wanted to convert monasteries into "places of study and good letters, and to the continual relief of the poor", but this was not done.[85] In 1536, the Dissolution of the Lesser Monasteries Act closed smaller houses valued at less than £200 a year.[73] Henry used the revenue to help build coastal defences (see Device Forts) against expected invasion, and all the land was given to the Crown or sold to the aristocracy.[additional citation(s) needed] Thirty-four houses were saved by paying for exemptions. Monks and nuns affected by closures were transferred to larger houses, and monks had the option of becoming secular clergy.[86]

The chapter house of Forde Abbey, a Cistercian monastery closed in 1539 and converted into a country house

The Royal Supremacy and the abolition of papal authority had not caused widespread unrest, but the attacks on monasteries and the abolition of saints' days and pilgrimages provoked violence. Mobs attacked those sent to break up monastic buildings. Suppression commissioners were attacked by local people in several places.[87] In Northern England, there were a series of uprisings against the dissolutions in late 1536 and early 1537. The Lincolnshire Rising occurred in October 1536 and culminated in a force of 40,000 rebels assembling at Lincoln. They demanded an end to taxation during peacetime, the repeal of the statute of uses, an end to the suppression of monasteries, and that heresy be purged and heretics punished. Henry refused to negotiate, and the revolt collapsed as the nervous gentry convinced the common people to disperse.[88]

The Pilgrimage of Grace was a more serious matter. The revolt began in October at Yorkshire and spread to the other northern counties. Around 50,000 strong, the rebels under Robert Aske's leadership restored 16 of the 26 northern monasteries that had been dissolved. Due to the size of the rebellion, the King was persuaded to negotiate. In December, the Duke of Norfolk offered the rebels a pardon and a parliament to consider their grievances. Aske then sent the rebels home. The promises made to them, however, were ignored by the King, and Norfolk was instructed to put the rebellion down. Forty-seven of the Lincolnshire rebels were executed, and 132 from the Pilgrimage of Grace. In Southern England, smaller disturbances took place in Cornwall and Walsingham in 1537.[89]

The failure of the Pilgrimage of Grace only sped up the process of dissolution and may have convinced Henry VIII that all religious houses needed to be closed. In 1540, the last monasteries were dissolved, wiping out an important element of traditional religion.[90] Former monks were given modest pensions from the Court of Augmentations, and those that could sought work as parish priests. Former nuns received smaller pensions and, as they were still bound by vows of chastity, forbidden to marry.[91] Henry personally devised a plan to form at least thirteen new dioceses so that most counties had one based on a former monastery (or more than one), though this scheme was only partly carried out. New dioceses were established at Bristol, Gloucester, Oxford, Peterborough, Westminster and Chester, but not, for instance, at Shrewsbury, Leicester or Waltham.[92]

Reforms reversed [ edit ]

According to historian Peter Marshall, Henry's religious reforms were based on the principles of "unity, obedience and the refurbishment of ancient truth".[93] Yet, the outcome was disunity and disobedience. Impatient Protestants took it upon themselves to further reform. Priests said Mass in English rather than Latin and were marrying in violation of clerical celibacy. Not only were there divisions between traditionalists and reformers, but Protestants themselves were divided between establishment reformers who held Lutheran beliefs and radicals who held Anabaptist and Sacramentarian views.[94] Reports of dissension from every part of England reached Cromwell daily—developments he tried to hide from the King.[95]

In September 1538, Stephen Gardiner returned to England, and official religious policy began to drift in a conservative direction.[96] This was due in part to the eagerness of establishment Protestants to disassociate themselves from religious radicals. In September, two Lutheran princes, the Elector of Saxony and Landgrave of Hesse, sent warnings of Anabaptist activity in England. A commission was swiftly created to seek out Anabaptists.[97] Henry personally presided at the trial of John Lambert in November 1538 for denying the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist. At the same time, he shared in the drafting of a proclamation ordering Anabaptists and Sacramentaries to get out of the country or face death. Discussion of the real presence (except by those educated in the universities) was forbidden, and priests who married were to be dismissed.[95][98]

It was becoming clear that the King's views on religion differed from those of Cromwell and Cranmer. Henry made his traditional preferences known during the Easter Triduum of 1539, where he crept to the cross on Good Friday.[99] Later that year, Parliament passed the Six Articles reaffirming Roman Catholic beliefs and practices such as transubstantiation, clerical celibacy, confession to a priest, votive masses, and withholding communion wine from the laity.[100]

On 28 June 1540 Cromwell, Henry's longtime advisor and loyal servant, was executed. Different reasons were advanced: that Cromwell would not enforce the Act of Six Articles; that he had supported Robert Barnes, Hugh Latimer and other heretics; and that he was responsible for Henry's marriage to Anne of Cleves, his fourth wife. Many other arrests under the Act followed.[101] On 30 July, the reformers Barnes, William Jerome and Thomas Gerrard were burned at the stake. In a display of religious impartiality, Thomas Abell, Richard Featherstone and Edward Powell—all Roman Catholics—were hanged and quartered while the Protestants burned.[102] European observers were shocked and bewildered. French diplomat Charles de Marillac wrote that Henry's religious policy was a "climax of evils" and that:

[I]t is difficult to have a people entirely opposed to new errors which does not hold with the ancient authority of the Church and of the Holy See, or, on the other hand, hating the Pope, which does not share some opinions with the Germans. Yet the government will not have either the one or the other, but insists on their keeping what is commanded, which is so often altered that it is difficult to understand what it is.[103]

The 14th-century Chantry Chapel of St Mary the Virgin in Wakefield, West Yorkshire. Chantries were endowments that paid priests to say masses for the dead to lessen their time in purgatory.

Despite setbacks, Protestants managed to win some victories. In May 1541, the King ordered copies of the Great Bible to be placed in all churches; failure to comply would result in a £2 fine. Protestants could celebrate the growing access to vernacular scripture as most churches had Bibles by 1545.[104][105] The iconoclastic policies of 1538 were continued in the autumn when the Archbishops of Canterbury and York were ordered to destroy all remaining shrines in England.[106] Furthermore, Cranmer survived formal charges of heresy in the Prebendaries' Plot of 1543.[107]

Traditionalists, nevertheless, seemed to have the upper hand. By the spring of 1543, Protestant innovations had been reversed, and only the break with Rome and the dissolution of the monasteries remained unchanged.[108] In May 1543, a new formulary was published to replace the Bishops' Book. This King's Book rejected justification by faith alone and defended traditional ceremonies and the use of images.[109] This was followed days later by passage of the Act for the Advancement of True Religion, which restricted Bible reading to men and women of noble birth. Henry expressed his fears to Parliament in 1545 that "the Word of God, is disputed, rhymed, sung and jangled in every ale house and tavern, contrary to the true meaning and doctrine of the same."[110]

By the spring of 1544, the conservatives appeared to be losing influence once again. In March, Parliament made it more difficult to prosecute people for violating the Six Articles. Cranmer's Exhortation and Litany, the first official vernacular service, was published in June 1544, and the King's Primer became the only authorised English prayer book in May 1545. Both texts had a reformed emphasis.[111] After the death of the conservative Edward Lee in September 1544, the Protestant Robert Holgate replaced him as Archbishop of York.[112] In December 1545, the King was empowered to seize the property of chantries (trust funds endowed to pay for priests to say masses for the dead). While Henry's motives were largely financial (England was at war with France and desperately in need of funds), the passage of the Chantries Act was "an indication of how deeply the doctrine of purgatory had been eroded and discredited".[113]

In 1546, the conservatives were once again in the ascendent. A series of controversial sermons preached by the Protestant Edward Crome set off a persecution of Protestants that the traditionalists used to effectively target their rivals. It was during this time that Anne Askew was tortured in the Tower of London and burnt at the stake. Even Henry's last wife, Katherine Parr, was suspected of heresy but saved herself by appealing to the King's mercy. With the Protestants on the defensive, traditionalists pressed their advantange by banning Protestant books.[114]

The conservative persecution of Queen Katherine, however, backfired.[115] By November 1546, there were already signs that religious policy was once again tilting towards Protestantism.[116] The King's will provided for a regency council to rule after his death, which would have been dominated by traditionalists, such as the Duke of Norfolk, Lord Chancellor Wriothesly, Bishop Gardiner and Bishop Tunstall.[117] After a dispute with the King, Bishop Gardiner, the leading conservative churchman, was disgraced and removed as a councilor. Later, the Duke of Norfolk, the most powerful conservative nobleman, was arrested.[118] By the time Henry died in 1547, the Protestant Edward Seymour, brother of Jane Seymour, Henry's third wife (and therefore uncle to the future Edward VI), managed—by a number of alliances such as with Lord Lisle—to gain control over the Privy Council.[119]

Edwardian Reformation [ edit ]

King Edward VI of England, in whose reign the reform of the English Church moved in a more Protestant direction

When Henry died in 1547, his nine-year-old son, Edward VI, inherited the throne. Because Edward was given a Protestant humanist education, Protestants held high expectations and hoped he would be like Josiah, the biblical king of Judah who destroyed the altars and images of Baal.[120] During the seven years of Edwards' reign, a Protestant establishment would gradually implement religious changes that were "designed to destroy one Church and build another, in a religious revolution of ruthless thoroughness".[121]

Initially, however, Edward was of little account politically.[122] Real power was in the hands of the regency council, which elected Edward Seymour, 1st Duke of Somerset, to be Lord Protector. The Protestant Somerset pursued reform hesitantly at first, partly because his powers were not unchallenged.[123] The Six Articles remained the law of the land, and a proclamation was issued on 24 May reassuring the people against any "innovations and changes in religion".[124]

Nevertheless, Seymour and Cranmer did plan to further the reformation of religion. In July, a Book of Homilies was published, from which all clergy were to preach from on Sundays.[125] The homilies were explicitly Protestant in their content, condemning relics, images, rosary beads, holy water, palms, and other "papistical superstitions". It also directly contradicted the King's Book by teaching "we be justified by faith only, freely, and without works". Despite objections from Gardiner, who questioned the legality of bypassing both Parliament and Convocation, justification by faith had been made a central teaching of the English Church.[126]

Iconoclasm and abolition of chantries [ edit ]

In August, thirty commissioners—nearly all Protestants—were appointed to carry out a royal visitation of England's churches.[127] The Royal Injunctions of 1547 issued to guide the commissioners were borrowed from Cromwell's 1538 injunctions but revised to be more radical. Historian Eamon Duffy calls them a "significant shift in the direction of full-blown Protestantism".[128] Church processions—one of the most dramatic and public aspects of the traditional liturgy—were banned.[129] The injunctions also attacked the use of sacramentals, such as holy water. It was emphasised that they imparted neither blessing nor healing but were only reminders of Christ.[130] Lighting votive candles before saints' images had been forbidden in 1538, and the 1547 injunctions went further by outlawing those placed on the rood loft.[131] Reciting the rosary was also condemned.[128]

The injunctions set off a wave of iconoclasm in the autumn of 1547.[132] While the injunctions only condemned images that were abused as objects of worship or devotion, the definition of abuse was broadened to justify the destruction of all images and relics.[133] Stained glass, shrines, statues, and roods were defaced or destroyed. Church walls were whitewashed and covered with biblical texts condemning idolatry.[134]

This statue in the Lady Chapel of Ely Cathedral was vandalized during the Reformation.

Conservative bishops Edmund Bonner and Gardiner protested the visitation, and both were arrested. Bonner spent nearly two weeks in the Fleet Prison before being released.[135] Gardiner was sent to the Fleet Prison in September and remained there until January 1548. However, he continued to refuse to enforce the new religious policies and was arrested once again in June when he was sent to the Tower of London for the rest of Edward's reign.[136]

When a new Parliament met in November 1547, it began to dismantle the laws passed during Henry VIII's reign to protect traditional religion.[137] The Act of Six Articles was repealed—decriminalising denial of the real, physical presence of Christ in the Eucharist.[138] The old heresy laws were also repealed, allowing free debate on religious questions.[139] In December, the Sacrament Act allowed the laity to receive communion under both kinds, the wine as well as the bread. This was opposed by conservatives but welcomed by Protestants.[140]

The Chantries Act of 1547 abolished the remaining chantries and confiscated their assets. Unlike the 1545 Chantry Act, the 1547 act was intentionally designed to eliminate the last remaining institutions dedicated to praying for the dead. Confiscated wealth funded the Rough Wooing of Scotland. Chantry priests had served parishes as auxiliary clergy and schoolmasters, and some communities were destroyed by the loss of the charitable and pastoral services of their chantries.[141][142]

How well this was received is disputed. Historian A.G. Dickens contends that people had "ceased to believe in intercessory masses for souls in purgatory",[143] but historian Eamon Duffy argues that the demolition of chantry chapels and the removal of images coincided with the activity of royal visitors.[144] The evidence is often ambiguous.[145] In some places, chantry priests continued to say prayers and landowners to pay them to do so.[146] Some parishes took steps to conceal images and relics in order to rescue them from confiscation and destruction.[147][148] Opposition to the removal of images was widespread—so much so that when during the Commonwealth, William Dowsing was commissioned to the task of image breaking in Suffolk, his task, as he records it, was enormous.[149]

1549 prayer book [ edit ]

The second year of Edward's reign was a turning point for the English Reformation; many people identified the year 1548, rather than the 1530s, as the beginning of the English Church's schism from the Roman Catholic Church.[150] On 18 January 1548, the Privy Council abolished the use of candles on Candlemas, ashes on Ash Wednesday and palms on Palm Sunday.[151] On 21 February, the council explicitly ordered the removal of all church images.[152]

On 8 March, a royal proclamation announced a more significant change—the first major reform of the Mass and of the Church of England's official eucharistic theology.[153] The "Order of the Communion" was a series of English exhortations and prayers that reflected Protestant theology and were inserted into the Latin Mass.[154][155] A significant departure from tradition was that individual confession to a priest—long a requirement before receiving the Eucharist—was made optional and replaced with a general confession said by the congregation as a whole. The effect on religious custom was profound as a majority of laypeople, not just Protestants, most likely ceased confessing their sins to their priests.[152] By 1548, Cranmer and other leading Protestants had moved from the Lutheran to the Reformed position on the Eucharist.[156] Significant to Cranmer's change of mind was the influence of Strasbourg theologian Martin Bucer.[157] This shift can be seen in the Communion order's teaching on the Eucharist. Laypeople were instructed that when receiving the sacrament they "spiritually eat the flesh of Christ", an attack on the belief in the real, bodily presence of Christ in the Eucharist.[158] The Communion order was incorporated into the new prayer book largely unchanged.[159]

Title page of the 1549 Book of Common Prayer

That prayer book and liturgy, the Book of Common Prayer, was authorized by the Act of Uniformity 1549. It replaced the several regional Latin rites then in use, such as the Use of Sarum, the Use of York and the Use of Hereford with an English-language liturgy.[160] Authored by Cranmer, this first prayer book was a temporary compromise with conservatives.[161] It provided Protestants with a service free from what they considered superstition, while maintaining the traditional structure of the mass.[162]

The cycles and seasons of the church year continued to be observed, and there were texts for daily Matins (Morning Prayer), Mass and Evensong (Evening Prayer). In addition, there was a calendar of saints' feasts with collects and scripture readings appropriate for the day. Priests still wore vestments—the prayer book recommended the cope rather than the chasuble. Many of the services were little changed. Baptism kept a strongly sacramental character, including the blessing of water in the baptismal font, promises made by godparents, making the sign of the cross on the child's forehead, and wrapping it in a white chrism cloth. The confirmation and marriage services followed the Sarum rite.[163] There were also remnants of prayer for the dead and the Requiem Mass, such as the provision for celebrating holy communion at a funeral.[164]

Nevertheless, the first Book of Common Prayer was a "radical" departure from traditional worship in that it "eliminated almost everything that had till then been central to lay Eucharistic piety".[165] Communion took place without any elevation of the consecrated bread and wine. The elevation had been the central moment of the old liturgy, attached as it was to the idea of real presence. In addition, the prayer of consecration was changed to reflect Protestant theology.[160] Three sacrifices were mentioned; the first was Christ's sacrifice on the cross. The second was the congregation's sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving, and the third was the offering of "ourselves, our souls and bodies, to be a reasonable, holy and lively sacrifice" to God.[166] While the medieval Canon of the Mass "explicitly identified the priest's action at the altar with the sacrifice of Christ", the Prayer Book broke this connection by stating the church's offering of thanksgiving in the Eucharist was not the same as Christ's sacrifice on the cross.[163] Rather than being the Church's sacrifice, the Eucharist was merely a means of partaking in and receiving the benefits of Christ's sacrifice.[167][168]

There were other departures from tradition. At least initially, there was no music because it would take time to replace the church's body of Latin music.[164] Most of the liturgical year was simply "bulldozed away" with only the major feasts of Christmas, Easter and Whitsun along with a few biblical saints' days (Apostles, Evangelists, John the Baptist and Mary Magdalene) and only two Marian feast days (the Purification and the Annunciation).[165] The Assumption, Corpus Christi and other festivals were gone.[164]

In 1549, Parliament also legalised clerical marriage, something already practised by some Protestants (including Cranmer) but considered an abomination by conservatives.[169]

Rebellion [ edit ]

Enforcement of the new liturgy did not always take place without a struggle. In the West Country, the introduction of the Book of Common Prayer was the catalyst for a series of uprisings through the summer of 1549. There were smaller upheavals elsewhere from the West Midlands to Yorkshire. The Prayer Book Rebellion was not only in reaction to the prayer book; the rebels demanded a full restoration of pre-Reformation Catholicism.[170] They were also motivated by economic concerns, such as enclosure.[171] In East Anglia, however, the rebellions lacked a Roman Catholic character. Kett's Rebellion in Norwich blended Protestant piety with demands for economic reforms and social justice.[172]

The insurrections were put down only after considerable loss of life.[173] Somerset was blamed and was removed from power in October. It was wrongly believed by both conservatives and reformers that the Reformation would be overturned. Succeeding Somerset as de facto regent was John Dudley, 1st Earl of Warwick, newly appointed Lord President of the Privy Council. Warwick saw further implementation of the reforming policy as a means of gaining Protestant support and defeating his conservative rivals.[174]

Further reform [ edit ]

A painting
Edward VI and the Pope: An Allegory of the Reformation. This Elizabethan work of propaganda depicts the handing over of power from Henry VIII, who lies dying in bed, to Edward VI, seated beneath a cloth of state with a slumping pope at his feet. In the top right of the picture is an image of men pulling down and smashing idols. At Edward's side are his uncle the Lord Protector Edward Seymour and members of the Privy Council.[175]

From that point on, the Reformation proceeded apace. Since the 1530s, one of the obstacles to Protestant reform had been the bishops, bitterly divided between a traditionalist majority and a Protestant minority. This obstacle was removed in 1550–1551 when the episcopate was purged of conservatives.[176] Edmund Bonner of London, William Rugg of Norwich, Nicholas Heath of Worcester, John Vesey of Exeter, Cuthbert Tunstall of Durham, George Day of Chichester and Stephen Gardiner of Winchester were either deprived of their bishoprics or forced to resign.[177][178] Thomas Thirlby, Bishop of Westminster, managed to stay a bishop only by being translated to the Diocese of Norwich, "where he did virtually nothing during his episcopate".[179] Traditionalist bishops were replaced by Protestants such as Nicholas Ridley, John Ponet, John Hooper and Miles Coverdale.[180][178]

The newly enlarged and emboldened Protestant episcopate turned its attention to ending efforts by conservative clergy to "counterfeit the popish mass" through loopholes in the 1549 prayer book. The Book of Common Prayer was composed during a time when it was necessary to grant compromises and concessions to traditionalists. This was taken advantage of by conservative priests who made the new liturgy as much like the old one as possible, including elevating the Eucharist.[181] The conservative Bishop Gardiner endorsed the prayer book while in prison,[162] and historian Eamon Duffy notes that many lay people treated the prayer book "as an English missal".[182]

To attack the mass, Protestants began demanding the removal of stone altars. Bishop Ridley launched the campaign in May 1550 when he commanded all altars to be replaced with wooden communion tables in his London diocese.[181] Other bishops throughout the country followed his example, but there was also resistance. In November 1550, the Privy Council ordered the removal of all altars in an effort to end all dispute.[183] While the prayer book used the term "altar", Protestants preferred a table because at the Last Supper Christ instituted the sacrament at a table. The removal of altars was also an attempt to destroy the idea that the Eucharist was Christ's sacrifice. During Lent in 1550, John Hooper preached, "as long as the altars remain, both the ignorant people, and the ignorant and evil-persuaded priest, will dream always of sacrifice".[181]

In March 1550, a new ordinal was published that was based on Martin Bucer's own treatise on the form of ordination. While Bucer had provided for only one service for all three orders of clergy, the English ordinal was more conservative and had separate services for deacons, priests and bishops.[174][184] During his consecration as bishop of Gloucester, John Hooper objected to the mention of "all saints and the holy Evangelist" in the Oath of Supremacy and to the requirement that he wear a black chimere over a white rochet. Hooper was excused from invoking the saints in his oath, but he would ultimately be convinced to wear the offensive consecration garb. This was the first battle in the vestments controversy, which was essentially a conflict over whether the church could require people to observe ceremonies that were neither necessary for salvation nor prohibited by scripture.[185]

1552 prayer book and parish confiscations [ edit ]

The 1549 Book of Common Prayer was criticised by Protestants both in England and abroad for being too susceptible to Roman Catholic re-interpretation. Martin Bucer identified 60 problems with the prayer book, and the Italian Peter Martyr Vermigli provided his own complaints. Shifts in Eucharistic theology between 1548 and 1552 also made the prayer book unsatisfactory—during that time English Protestants achieved a consensus rejecting any real bodily presence of Christ in the Eucharist. Some influential Protestants such as Vermigli defended Zwingli's symbolic view of the Eucharist. Less radical Protestants such as Bucer and Cranmer advocated for a spiritual presence in the sacrament.[186] Cranmer himself had already adopted receptionist views on the Lord's Supper.[187] In April 1552, a new Act of Uniformity authorised a revised Book of Common Prayer to be used in worship by November 1.[188]

This new prayer book removed many of the traditional elements in the 1549 prayer book, resulting in a more Protestant liturgy. The communion service was designed to remove any hint of consecration or change in the bread and wine. Instead of unleavened wafers, ordinary bread was to be used.[189] The prayer of invocation was removed, and the minister no longer said "the body of Christ" when delivering communion. Rather, he said, "Take and eat this, in remembrance that Christ died for thee, and feed on him in thy heart by faith, with thanksgiving". Christ's presence in the Lord's Supper was a spiritual presence "limited to the subjective experience of the communicant".[189] Anglican bishop and scholar Colin Buchanan interprets the prayer book to teach that "the only point where the bread and wine signify the body and blood is at reception".[190] Rather than reserving the sacrament (which often led to Eucharistic adoration), any leftover bread or wine was to be taken home by the curate for ordinary consumption.[191]

In the new prayer book, the last vestiges of prayers for the dead were removed from the funeral service.[192] Unlike the 1549 version, the 1552 prayer book removed many traditional sacramentals and observances that reflected belief in the blessing and exorcism of people and objects. In the baptism service, infants no longer received minor exorcism and the white chrisom robe. Anointing was no longer included in the services for baptism, ordination and visitation of the sick.[193] These ceremonies were altered to emphasise the importance of faith, rather than trusting in rituals or objects. Clerical vestments were simplified—ministers were only allowed to wear the surplice and bishops had to wear a rochet.[189]

Throughout Edward's reign, inventories of parish valuables, ostensibly for preventing embezzlement, convinced many the government planned to seize parish property, just as was done to the chantries.[194] These fears were confirmed in March 1551 when the Privy Council ordered the confiscation of church plate and vestments "for as much as the King's Majestie had neede [sic] presently of a mass of money".[195] No action was taken until 1552–1553 when commissioners were appointed. They were instructed to leave only the "bare essentials" required by the 1552 Book of Common Prayer—a surplice, tablecloths, communion cup and a bell. Items to be seized included copes, chalices, chrismatories, patens, monstrances and candlesticks.[196] Many parishes sold their valuables rather than have them confiscated at a later date.[194] The money funded parish projects that could not be challenged by royal authorities.[197] In many parishes, items were concealed or given to local gentry who had, in fact, lent them to the church.[198]

The confiscations caused tensions between Protestant church leaders and Warwick, now Duke of Northumberland. Cranmer, Ridley and other Protestant leaders did not fully trust Northumberland. Northumberland in turn sought to undermine these bishops by promoting their critics, such as Jan Laski and John Knox.[199] Cranmer's plan for a revision of English canon law, the Reformatio legum ecclesiasticarum, failed in Parliament due to Northumberland's opposition.[200] Despite such tensions, a new doctrinal statement to replace the King's Book was issued on royal authority in May 1553. The Forty-two Articles reflected the Reformed theology and practice taking shape during Edward's reign, which historian Christopher Haigh describes as a "restrained Calvinism".[201] It affirmed predestination and that the King of England was Supreme Head of the Church of England under Christ.[202]

Edward became seriously ill in February and died in July 1553. Before his death, Edward was concerned that Mary, his devoutly Catholic sister, would overturn his religious reforms. A new plan of succession was created in which both of Edward's sisters Mary and Elizabeth were bypassed on account of illegitimacy in favour of the Protestant Jane Grey, the granddaughter of Edward's aunt Mary Tudor and daughter in law of the Duke of Northumberland. This new succession violated the Succession Act of 1544 and was widely seen as an attempt by Northumberland to stay in power.[203] Northumberland was unpopular due to the church confiscations, and support for Jane collapsed.[204] On 19 July, the Privy Council proclaimed Mary queen to the acclamation of the crowds in London. [205]

Marian Restoration [ edit ]

Queen Mary I of England restored the English allegiance to Rome.

Reconciling with Rome [ edit ]

Both Protestants and Roman Catholics understood that the accession of Mary I to the throne meant a restoration of traditional religion.[206] Before any official sanction, Latin Masses began reappearing throughout England, despite the 1552 Book of Common Prayer remaining the only legal liturgy.[207] Mary began her reign cautiously by emphasising the need for tolerance in matters of religion and proclaiming that, for the time being, she would not compel religious conformity. This was in part Mary's attempt to avoid provoking Protestant opposition before she could consolidate her power.[208] While Protestants were not a majority of the population, their numbers had grown through Edward's reign. Historian Eamon Duffy writes that "Protestantism was a force to be reckoned with in London and in towns like Bristol, Rye, and Colchester, and it was becoming so in some northern towns such as Hessle, Hull, and Halifax."[209]

Following Mary's accession, the Duke of Norfolk along with the conservative bishops Bonner, Gardiner, Tunstall, Day and Heath were released from prison and restored to their former dioceses. By September 1553, Hooper and Cranmer were imprisoned. Northumberland himself was executed but not before his conversion to Catholicism.[210]

The break with Rome and the religious reforms of Henry VIII and Edward VI were achieved through parliamentary legislation and could only be reversed through Parliament. When Parliament met in October, Bishop Gardiner, now Lord Chancellor, initially proposed the repeal of all religious legislation since 1529. The House of Commons refused to pass this bill, and after heated debate,[211] Parliament repealed all Edwardian religious laws, including clerical marriage and the prayer book, in the First Statute of Repeal.[212] By 20 December, the Mass was reinstated by law.[213] There were disappointments for Mary: Parliament refused to penalise non-attendance at Mass, would not restore confiscated church property, and left open the question of papal supremacy.[214]

If Mary was to secure England for Roman Catholicism, she needed an heir and her Protestant half-sister Elizabeth had to be prevented from inheriting the Crown. On the advice of her cousin Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, she married his son, Philip II of Spain, in 1554. There was opposition, and even a rebellion in Kent (led by Sir Thomas Wyatt); even though it was provided that Philip would never inherit the kingdom if there was no heir, received no estates and had no coronation.[215]

By the end of 1554, Henry VIII's religious settlement had been re-instituted, but England was still not reunited with Rome. Before reunion could occur, church property disputes had to be settled—which, in practice, meant letting the nobility and gentry who had bought confiscated church lands keep them. Cardinal Reginald Pole, the Queen's cousin, arrived in November 1554 as papal legate to end England's schism with the Roman Catholic Church.[215] On 28 November, Pole addressed Parliament to ask it to end the schism, declaring "I come not to destroy, but to build. I come to reconcile, not to condemn. I come not to compel, but to call again."[216] In response, Parliament submitted a petition to the Queen the next day asking that "this realm and dominions might be again united to the Church of Rome by the means of the Lord Cardinal Pole".[216]

On 30 November, Pole spoke to both houses of Parliament, absolving the members of Parliament "with the whole realm and dominions thereof, from all heresy and schism".[217] Afterwards, bishops absolved diocesan clergy, and they in turn absolved parishioners.[218] On 26 December, the Privy Council introduced legislation repealing the religious legislation of Henry VIII's reign and implementing the reunion with Rome. This bill was passed as the Second Statute of Repeal.[219]

Catholic recovery [ edit ]

Cardinal Reginald Pole presided over the English Church's reconciliation with Rome

Historian Eamon Duffy writes that the Marian religious "programme was not one of reaction but of creative reconstruction" absorbing whatever was considered positive in the reforms of Henry VIII and Edward VI.[220] The result was "subtly but distinctively different from the Catholicism of the 1520s."[220] According to historian Christopher Haigh, the Catholicism taking shape in Mary's reign "reflected the mature Erasmian Catholicism" of its leading clerics, who were all educated in the 1520s and 1530s.[221] Marian church literature, church benefactions and churchwarden accounts suggest less emphasis on saints, images and prayer for the dead. There was a greater focus on the need for inward contrition in addition to external acts of penance.[222] Cardinal Pole himself was a member of the Spirituali, a Catholic reform movement that shared with Protestants an emphasis on man's total dependence on God's grace by faith and Augustinian views on salvation.[223][224]

Cardinal Pole would eventually replace Cranmer as Archbishop of Canterbury in 1556, jurisdictional issues between England and Rome having prevented Cranmer's removal. Mary could have had Cranmer tried and executed for treason—he had supported the claims of Lady Jane Grey—but she resolved to have him tried for heresy. His recantations of his Protestantism would have been a major coup. Unhappily for her, he unexpectedly withdrew his recantations at the last minute as he was to be burned at the stake, thus ruining her government's propaganda victory.[225]

As papal legate, Pole possessed authority over both his Province of Canterbury and the Province of York, which allowed him to oversee the Counter-Reformation throughout all of England.[226] He re-installed images, vestment and plate in churches. Around 2,000 married clergy were separated from their wives, but the majority of these were allowed to continue their work as priests.[225][227] Pole was aided by some of the leading Catholic intellectuals, Spanish members of the Dominican Order: Pedro de Soto, Juan de Villagarcía and Bartolomé Carranza.[225]

In 1556, Pole ordered clergy to read one chapter of Bishop Bonner's A Profitable and Necessary Doctrine to their parishioners every Sunday. Modelled on the King's Book of 1543, Bonner's work was a survey of basic Catholic teaching organized around the Apostle's Creed, Ten Commandments, seven deadly sins, sacraments, Lord’s Prayer and Hail Mary.[228] Bonner also produced a children's catechism and a collection of homilies.[229]

Westminster Abbey was one of seven monasteries re-founded during the Marian Restoration.

From December 1555 to February 1556, Cardinal Pole presided over a national legatine synod that produced a set of decrees entitled Reformatio Angliae or the Reformation of England.[230] The actions taken by the synod anticipated many of the reforms enacted throughout the Catholic Church after the Council of Trent.[226] Pole believed that ignorance and lack of discipline among the clergy had led to England's religious turmoil, and the synod's reforms were designed to remedy both problems. Clerical absenteeism (the practice of clergy failing to reside in their diocese or parish), pluralism, and simony were condemned.[231] Preaching was placed at the centre of the pastoral office,[232] and all clergy were to provide sermons to the people (rectors and vicars who failed to were fined).[231] The most important part of the plan was the order to establish a seminary in each diocese, which would replace the disorderly manner in which priests had been trained previously. The Council of Trent would later impose the seminary system upon the rest of the Catholic Church.[232] It was also the first to introduce the altar tabernacle used to reserve Eucharistic bread for devotion and adoration.[226]

Mary did what she could to restore church finances and land taken in the reigns of her father and brother. In 1555, she returned to the church the First Fruits and Tenths revenue, but with these new funds came the responsibility of paying the pensions of ex-religious. She restored six religious houses with her own money, notably Westminster Abbey for the Benedictines and Syon Abbey for the Bridgettines.[233] However, there were limits to what could be restored. Only seven religious houses were re-founded between 1555 and 1558, though there were plans to re-establish more. Of the 1,500 ex-religious still living, only about a hundred resumed monastic life, and only a small number of chantries were re-founded. Re-establishments were hindered by the changing nature of charitable giving. A plan to re-establish Greyfriars in London was prevented because its buildings were occupied by Christ's Hospital, a school for orphaned children.[234]

There is debate among historians over how vibrant the restoration was on the local level. According to historian A. G. Dickens, "Parish religion was marked by religious and cultural sterility",[235] though historian Christopher Haigh observed enthusiasm, marred only by poor harvests that produced poverty and want.[236] Recruitment to the English clergy began to rise after almost a decade of declining ordinations.[237] Repairs to long-neglected churches began. In the parishes, "restoration and repair continued, new bells were bought, and church ales produced their bucolic profits".[238] Great church feasts were restored and celebrated with plays, pageants and processions. However, Bishop Bonner's attempt to establish weekly processions in 1556 was a failure. Haigh writes that in years during which processions were banned people had discovered "better uses for their time" as well as "better uses for their money than offering candles to images".[239] The focus was on "the crucified Christ, in the mass, the rood, and Corpus Christi devotion".[237]

Obstacles [ edit ]

Protestants who refused to conform remained an obstacle to Catholic plans. Around 800 Protestants fled England to find safety in Protestant areas of Germany and Switzerland, establishing networks of independent congregations. Safe from persecution, these Marian exiles carried on a propaganda campaign against Roman Catholicism and the Queen's Spanish marriage, sometimes calling for rebellion.[240][241] Those who remained in England were forced to practice their faith in secret and meet in underground congregations.[242]

Frontispiece of John Foxe's Book of Martrys

In 1555, the initial reconciling tone of the regime began to harden with the revival of the medieval heresy laws, which authorized capital punishment as a penalty for heresy.[243] The persecution of heretics was uncoordinated—sometimes arrests were ordered by the Privy Council, others by bishops, and others by lay magistrates.[244] Protestants brought attention to themselves usually due to some act of dissent, such as denouncing the Mass or refusing to receive the sacrament.[245] A particularly violent act of protest was William Flower's stabbing of a priest during Mass on Easter Sunday, 14 April 1555.[246] Individuals accused of heresy were examined by a church official and, if heresy was found, given the choice between death and signing a recantation.[247] In some cases, Protestants were burnt at the stake after renouncing their recantation.[248]

Around 284 Protestants were burnt at the stake for heresy.[249] Several leading reformers were executed, including Thomas Cranmer, Hugh Latimer, Nicholas Ridley, John Rogers, John Hooper, Robert Ferrar, Rowland Taylor, and John Bradford.[250] Lesser known figures were also among the victims, including around 51 women such as Joan Waste and Agnes Prest.[251] Historian O. T. Hargrave writes that the Marian persecution was not "excessive" by "contemporary continental standards"; however, "it was unprecedented in the English experience".[252] Historian Christopher Haigh writes that it "failed to intimidate all Protestants", whose bravery at the stake inspired others; however, it "was not a disaster: if it did not help the Catholic cause, it did not do much to harm it."[238] After her death, the Queen became known as "Bloody Mary" due to the influence of John Foxe, one of the Marian exiles.[253] Published in 1563, Foxe's Book of Martyrs provided accounts of the executions, and in 1571 the Convocation of Canterbury ordered that Foxe's book should be placed in every cathedral in the land.[254]

Mary's efforts at restoring Roman Catholicism were also frustrated by the church itself. Pope Paul IV declared war on Philip and recalled Pole to Rome to have him tried as a heretic. Mary refused to let him go. The support she might have expected from a grateful Pope was thus denied.[255] From 1557, the Pope refused to confirm English bishops, leading to vacancies and hurting the Marian religious program.[231]

Despite these obstacles, the 5-year restoration was successful. There was support for traditional religion among the people, and Protestants remained a minority. Consequently, Protestants secretly ministering to underground congregations, such as Thomas Bentham, were planning for a long haul, a ministry of survival. Mary's death in November 1558, childless and without having made provision for a Roman Catholic to succeed her, meant that her Protestant sister Elizabeth would be the next queen.[256]

Elizabethan Settlement [ edit ]

Queen Elizabeth I of England reached a moderate religious settlement.

Elizabeth I inherited a kingdom in which a majority of people, especially the political elite, were religiously conservative, and England's main ally was Catholic Spain.[257] For these reasons, the proclamation announcing her accession forbade any "breach, alteration, or change of any order or usage presently established within this our realm".[258] This was only temporary. The new Queen was Protestant, though a conservative one.[259] She also filled her new government with Protestants. The Queen's principal secretary was Sir William Cecil, a moderate Protestant.[260] Her Privy Council was filled with former Edwardian politicians, and only Protestants preached at Court.[261][262]

When the Queen's first Parliament opened in January 1559, its chief goal was the difficult task of reaching a religious settlement. In February, the House of Commons passed a Reformation Bill that would restore royal supremacy as well as the 1550 Ordinal and a slightly revised 1552 Prayer Book.[263][264] The bill was challenged in the House of Lords, where opposition was led by the 20 Catholic bishops.[265] The Lords amended the bill by leaving the Mass unchanged and refusing to grant the Queen the title of Supreme Head (though she was free to adopt it herself). This bill would have returned the Church to its position at the death of Henry VIII rather than to that when Edward VI died.[264][266] Rather than accept this, the government decided to split the bill into one dealing with royal supremacy and another dealing with religious reform.

Act of Supremacy 1558 [ edit ]

This act made null and void (with certain specific exceptions) the Marian act of 1554 that had repealed all Henry VIII's legislation from 1529 onwards, which had denied the authority of the See of Rome[267] and also confirmed Elizabeth as Supreme Governor of the Church of England. "Supreme Governor" was a suitably equivocal title that made Elizabeth head of the church without ever saying she was. This was important for two reasons: (1) it satisfied those who felt that a woman could not rule the church, and (2) it acted in a conciliatory way toward English Roman Catholics. For the clergy, all but a few were ordained with the Roman Rite, Elizabeth's changes were more wholesale than those of her half-brother, Edward, had been. All but one (Anthony Kitchin) of the bishops lost their posts, a hundred fellows of Oxford colleges were deprived; many dignitaries resigned rather than take the oath. The bishops who were removed from the ecclesiastical bench were replaced by appointees who would agree to the reforms. Since the government was concerned that continuity of Orders continue without a break Mathew Parker was consecrated Archbishop of Canterbury by two bishops who had been consecrated in the mid-1530s using the Pontifical (Barlow and Hodgkins) and two with the English Ordinal of 1550 (Scory and Coverdale) who were consecrated on the same day by Cranmer, Ridley and Hodgkins who were consecrated in 1533, 1537 and 1548 respectively with the Roman Rites in the Pontifical).

On the question of images, Elizabeth's initial reaction was to allow crucifixes and candlesticks and the restoration of roods, but some of the new bishops whom she had elevated protested. In 1560, Edmund Grindal, one of the Marian exiles now made Bishop of London, was allowed to enforce the demolition of rood lofts in London and in 1561 the Queen herself ordered the demolition of all lofts.[268] Thereafter, the determination to prevent any further restoration was evidenced by the more thoroughgoing destruction of roods, vestments, stone altars, dooms, statues and other ornaments. The queen also appointed a new Privy Council, removing many Roman Catholic counsellors by doing so. Under Elizabeth, factionalism in the council and conflicts at court greatly diminished. The Act of Supremacy was passed without difficulty.

Act of Uniformity 1558 [ edit ]

The Act of Uniformity 1558, which forced people to attend Sunday service in a parish church with a new version of the Book of Common Prayer, passed by only three votes.[269][270] The Bill of Uniformity was more cautious than the initial Reformation Bill. It revoked the harsh laws proposed against Roman Catholics, it removed the abuse of the pope from the litany and kept the wording that allowed for an interpretation of the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist without making any declaration about the matter (transubstantion is actually condemned in the Thirty-nine Articles). The Sacrifices of Masses was denounced. Reference to the Holy Communion as an oblation was restricted to an optional Prayer of Oblation after communion in which the congregation asked God to accept "this our sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving" without defining specifically what this referred to or to any connection to the sacramental gifts as was the case in traditional doctrine.[citation needed]

As for a eucharistic "theory" of the real presence most agreeable to Anglican opinion for centuries without ever being official, as there never has been one on the issue, it was a form of receptionism (a term not actually coined until 1867) which asserts that Christ is truly present but after a spiritual manner (i.e. invisible and non-corporeal or not carnal as understood to be in his natural body, so the ambivalent "We most heartily thank thee for thou does feed us in these holy mysteries with the spiritual food of the most precious Body and Blood of our Saviour Jesus Christ", Book of Common Prayer, Prayer of Thanksgiving after Communion) while the bread and wine remain in their natural substances (referred to as Calvinist Receptionism or Virtualism).[271] Richard Hooker, the greatest defender of the Elizabethan Religious Settlement, brushed aside transubstantiation and consubstantiation while insisting that the "sacrament is a true and real participation of Christ, who thereby imparteth himself even his whole Person as a mystical Head unto every soul that receiveth him"—and less to dispute the manner how—"what these elements are skillet not".[272] The refusal to burden "holy things" with too many details is typically Anglican: at the time this was a strategy to try to please as many people as possible, but over time it became a virtue resolutely refusing definitively to describe itself as Protestant or Catholic.[273] Her church would not move with the Continental times,[274] whether Protestant or Catholic. The Church of England as dictated to by the government became content to define Catholicity as adherence to the first Four Ecumenical Councils as seen in the historic Creeds, the teachings of the Church Fathers and Catholic Bishops (the Injunctions of 1571), Scripture, and Tradition. It would not be a Confessional Church based on the writings of a charismatic leader nor have a magisterium as in the Papacy. Instead in light of Hooker's writings there would be reason as the authority to act, continuity over Reformation divide and hospitality to sacramental modes of thought,[275] in particular the place of the Incarnation.[276] Anglicanism would come to see itself as primarily a liturgical tradition as expressed in the Prayer Book, and the axiom, "the law of praying is the law of believing." Although not a creation of the Queen, she laid the foundation for the Church of England as the Anglican "via Media" under the early Stuart monarchs.

After Parliament was dismissed, Elizabeth and Cecil drafted the Royal Injunctions. These were additions to the settlement, and largely stressed continuity with the Catholic past—clergy were ordered to wear the surplice and the use of the cope was allowed in cathedrals and collegiate chapels—especially since all the clergy upon her accession the throne were Roman Catholic. Men were ordained to the three traditional orders of deacon, priest and bishop and so referred to in the Prayer Book rites. The Ornaments Rubric was introduced and states that the ornaments of the church and ministers thereof shall remain as they were in the second year of the reign of Edward VI, i.e. in 1548, when Mass was still celebrated (the Oxford Movement in the 19th century interpreted this as permission to wear chasubles, dalmatics and other vestments). Wafers, as opposed to ordinary baker's bread, were to be used as the bread at Communion. Communion would be taken kneeling. The Black Rubric which denied the real and essential presence of Christ in the consecrated elements but allowed kneeling as long as this act did not imply adoration was removed from the Forty-Two Articles of Religion and nor replaced until 1662 with modified language denying the physical presence of Christ in his earthly body. The Queen had the Rubric removed as an offense to her personal beliefs. There had been opposition to the settlement in rural England, which for the most part was largely Roman Catholic, so the changes aimed for acceptance of the settlement. What succeeded more than anything else was the sheer length of Elizabeth's reign; while Mary had been able to impose her programme for a mere five years, Elizabeth had forty-five. Those who delayed, "looking for a new day" when restoration would again be commanded, were defeated by the passing of years.[277]

Puritans and Roman Catholics [ edit ]

Elizabeth's reign saw the emergence of Puritanism, which encompassed those Protestants who, whilst they agreed that there should be one national church, felt that the church had been but partially reformed. Puritanism ranged from hostility to the content of the Prayer Book and "popish" ceremony, to a desire that church governance be radically reformed. Grindal was made Archbishop of Canterbury in 1575 and chose to oppose even the Queen in his desire to forward the Puritan agenda. He ended a 6,000-word reproach to her with, "Bear with me, I beseech you Madam, if I choose rather to offend your earthly majesty than to offend the heavenly majesty of God."[278] He was placed under house arrest for his trouble and though he was not deprived, his death in 1583 put an end to the hopes of his supporters.

Grindal's successor, Archbishop Whitgift, more reflected the Queen's determination to discipline those who were unprepared to accept her settlement. A conformist, he imposed a degree of obedience on the clergy that apparently alarmed even the Queen's ministers, such as Lord Burghley.[279] The Puritan cause was not helped even by its friends. The pseudonymous "Martin Marprelate" tracts, which attacked conformist clergy with a libellous humorous tone, outraged senior Puritan clergy and set the government on an unsuccessful attempt to run the writer to earth.[280] The defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588 incidentally made it more difficult for Puritans to resist the conclusion that since God "blew with his wind and they were scattered" he could not be too offended by the religious establishment in the land.[281]

On the other side, there were still huge numbers of Roman Catholics. Some conformed, bending with the times, hoping that there would be a fresh reverse. Vestments were still hidden, golden candlesticks bequeathed, chalices kept. The Mass was still celebrated in some places[282] alongside the new Communion service but was more difficult than before. Both Roman Catholic priests and laity lived a double life, apparently conforming, but avoiding taking the oath of conformity. Only as time passed did recusancy—refusal to attend Protestant services—became more common. Jesuits and seminary priests, trained in Douai and Rome to make good the losses of English priests, encouraged this.

By the 1570s, an underground church was growing fast as the Church of England became more Protestant and less bearable for Roman Catholics who were still a sizeable minority.[283] Only one public attempt to restore the old religion occurred: the Revolt of the Northern Earls in 1569. It was a botched attempt; in spite of tumultuous crowds who greeted the rebels in Durham, the rebellion did not spread. The assistance they sought did not materialise, their communication with allies at Court was poor. They came nowhere near to freeing Mary Stuart, whose presence might have rallied support, from her imprisonment in Tutbury.[284]

The Roman Catholic Church's refusal to countenance occasional attendance at Protestant services, as well as the excommunication of Elizabeth by Pope Pius V in 1570, presented the choice to Roman Catholics more starkly. The arrival of the seminary priests, while it was a lifeline to many Roman Catholics, brought further trouble. Elizabeth's ministers took steps to stem the tide: fines for refusal to attend church were raised from 12 d. per service to £20 a month, fifty times an artisan's wage; it was now treason to be absolved from schism and reconciled to Rome; the execution of priests began—the first in 1577, four in 1581, eleven in 1582, two in 1583, six in 1584, fifty-three by 1590, and seventy more between 1601 and 1608.[285][286] It became treasonable for a Roman Catholic priest ordained abroad to enter the country. Because the papacy had called for the deposing of the Queen, the choice for moderate Roman Catholics lay between treason and damnation. The list of Catholic martyrs of the English Reformation was extensive.

There is some distance between legislation and its enforcement. The governmental attacks on recusancy were mostly upon the gentry. Few recusants were actually fined; the fines that were imposed were often at reduced rates; the persecution eased; Catholic priests came to recognise that they should not refuse communion to occasional conformists.[287] The persecutions did not extinguish the faith, but they tested it sorely. The huge number of Roman Catholics in East Anglia and the North in the 1560s disappeared into the general population in part because recusant priests largely served the great Roman Catholic houses, which alone could hide them. Without the Mass and pastoral care, yeomen, artisans and husbandmen fell into conformism.[288] Roman Catholicism, supported by foreign or expatriate priests, came to be seen as treasonous.[citation needed]

Legacy [ edit ]

Polemical popular print with a Catalogue of Sects, 1647.

By the time of Elizabeth's death a third party had emerged, "perfectly hostile" to Puritans but not adherent to Rome. It preferred the revised Book of Common Prayer of 1559, which was without some of the matters offensive to Roman Catholics.[289] The recusants had been removed from the centre of the stage. The new dispute was now between the Puritans (who wished to see an end of the prayer book and episcopacy), and this third party (the considerable body of people who looked kindly on the Elizabethan Settlement, who rejected prophesyings, whose spirituality had been nourished by the Prayer Book and who preferred the governance of bishops).[290][page needed]

It was between these two groups that, after Elizabeth's death in 1603, a new, more savage episode of the Reformation was in the process of gestation. During the reigns of the Stuart kings, James I and Charles I, the battle lines were to become more defined, leading ultimately to the English Civil War, the first on English soil to engulf parts of the civilian population. The war was only partly about religion, but the abolition of prayer book and episcopacy by a Puritan Parliament was an element in the causes of the conflict. As historian MacCulloch has noted, the legacy of these tumultuous events can be recognised, throughout the Commonwealth (1649–60) and the Restoration that followed it, and beyond. This third party was to become the core of the restored Church of England, but at the price for further division.

Historiography [ edit ]

The historiography of the English Reformation has seen vigorous clashes among dedicated protagonists and scholars for five centuries. The main factual details at the national level have been clear since 1900, as laid out for example by James Anthony Froude[291] and Albert Pollard.[292]

Reformation historiography has seen many schools of interpretation with Protestant, Catholic, Anglican historians using their own religious perspectives.[293][page needed] In addition there has been a highly influential Whig interpretation, based on liberal secularized Protestantism, that depicted the Reformation in England, in the words of Ian Hazlitt, as "the midwife delivering England from the Dark Ages to the threshold of modernity, and so a turning point of progress". Finally among the older schools was a neo-Marxist interpretation that stressed the economic decline of the old elites in the rise of the landed gentry and middle classes. All these approaches still have representatives, but the main thrust of scholarly historiography since the 1970s falls into four groupings or schools, according to Hazlett.[294][page needed]

Geoffrey Elton leads the first faction with an agenda rooted in political historiography. It concentrates on the top of the early modern church-state looking at it at the mechanics of policymaking and the organs of its implementation and enforcement. The key player for Elton was not Henry VIII, but rather his principal Secretary of State Thomas Cromwell. Elton downplays the prophetic spirit of the religious reformers in the theology of keen conviction, dismissing them as the meddlesome intrusions from fanatics and bigots.[295][296]

Secondly, Geoffrey Dickens and others were motivated by a primarily religious perspective. They prioritize the religious and subjective side of the movement. While recognizing the Reformation was imposed from the top, just as it was everywhere else in Europe, it also responded to aspirations from below. Dickens has been criticized for underestimating the strength of residual and revived Roman Catholicism, but has been praised for his demonstration of the close ties to European influences. In the Dickens school, David Loades has stressed the theological importance of the Reformation for Anglo-British development.[297]

Revisionists comprise a third school, led by Christopher Haigh, Jack Scarisbrick and numerous other scholars. Their main achievement was the discovery of an entirely new corpus of primary sources at the local level, leading them to the emphasis on Reformation as it played out on a daily and local basis, with much less emphasis on the control from the top they emphasize turning away from elite sources they emphasize local parish records, diocesan files, guild records, data from boroughs, the courts, and especially telltale individual wills.

Finally, Patrick Collinson and others have brought much more precision to the theological landscape, with Calvinist Puritans who were impatient with the Anglican caution sent compromises. Indeed, the Puritans were a distinct subgroup who did not comprise all of Calvinism. The Church of England thus emerged as a coalition of factions, all of them Protestant inspiration.[298]

All the recent schools have decentered Henry VIII, and minimized hagiography. They have paid more attention to localities, Catholicism, radicals, and theological niceties. On Catholicism, the older schools overemphasized Thomas More (1470–1535), to the neglect of other bishops and factors inside Catholicism. The older schools too often concentrated on elite London, the newer ones look to the English villages.[299]

See also [ edit ]

Notes [ edit ]

  1. ^ Scruton (1996, p. 470): "The Reformation must not be confused with the changes introduced into the Church of England during the 'Reformation Parliament' of 1529–36, which were of a political rather than a religious nature, designed to unite the secular and religious sources of authority within a single sovereign power: the Anglican Church did not until later make any substantial change in doctrine."
  2. ^ a b Bray 1994, p. 115.
  3. ^ a b MacCulloch 1996, p. 210.
  4. ^ MacCulloch 2001, pp. 1–2.
  5. ^ a b MacCulloch 2001, pp. 4–5.
  6. ^ Moorman 1983, p. 24.
  7. ^ Brigden 2000, p. 86f.
  8. ^ Duffy 2005, pp. xxi–xxii.
  9. ^ MacCulloch 2003, p. 36.
  10. ^ Dickens 1959.
  11. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 29–32.
  12. ^ MacCulloch 2003, pp. 112–111.
  13. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 164.
  14. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 123.
  15. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 27.
  16. ^ MacCulloch 2003, pp. 119–122,130.
  17. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 126.
  18. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 146.
  19. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 20,28.
  20. ^ MacCulloch 2003, pp. 202–203.
  21. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 124.
  22. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 58.
  23. ^ MacCulloch 2003, p. 203.
  24. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 132.
  25. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 186.
  26. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 188.
  27. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 203–204.
  28. ^ Brigden (2000, p. 103): "He ... believed he that he could keep his own secrets ... but he was often deceived and he deceived himself."
  29. ^ Ryrie 2009, p. 131.
  30. ^ Brigden 2000, p. 111.
  31. ^ Brigden 2000, p. 111. Her music book contained an illustration of a falcon pecking at a pomegranate: the falcon was her badge, the pomegranate, that of Granada, Catherine's badge.
  32. ^ Warnicke 1983, p. 38.
  33. ^ Marshall (2017, p. 164):"Henry wanted an annulment—a formal and legal declaration of the marriage's invalidity. Yet the word contemporaries used, divorce, captures better the legal and emotional turmoil."
  34. ^ Lacey 1972, p. 70.
  35. ^ Phillips 1991, p. 20.
  36. ^ Lacey 1972, p. 17.
  37. ^ Marshall (2017, pp. 166–167) writes, "Inconveniently for Henry, another Old Testament verse (Deut. 25:5) seemingly qualified the Levitical prohibition, commanding a man to take to wife his deceased brother's widow, if there had been no child."
  38. ^ Morris 1998, p. 166.
  39. ^ Brigden 2000, p. 114.
  40. ^ Haigh 1993, pp. 93–94.
  41. ^ Haigh, p. 73.
  42. ^ Brigden 2000, p. 116.
  43. ^ MacCulloch 2003, p. 199.
  44. ^ Haigh 1993, pp. 105–106.
  45. ^ Morris 1998, p. 172.
  46. ^ Tanner (1930, p. 17) gives this as "their singular protector, only and supreme lord, and, as far as the law of Christ allows, even Supreme Head".
  47. ^ Brigden 2000, p. 118.
  48. ^ Tanner 1930.
  49. ^ After prolonged debate in the House of Commons, it was clear they would not reach unanimity over the Bill—so Henry ordered a division. He commanded those in favour of his success and the "welfare of the realm" to one side of the House, and those who opposed him and the Bill to the other. Thus, he obtained a majority.
  50. ^ Elton 1982, p. 353.
  51. ^ Elton 1991, p. 160.
  52. ^ Elton 1982, pp. 364–365.
  53. ^ Ridley 1962, pp. 59–63.
  54. ^ Catholic Encyclopedia, Henry VIII. Accessed 21 August 2009.
  55. ^ Lehmberg 1970.
  56. ^ Elton 1991, p. 162.
  57. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 176–177,179: Borrowing from Luther, Tyndale argued that papal and clerical claims to independent power were unscriptural and that the king's "law is God's law". In 1531, Henry sought, through Robert Barnes, Luther's opinion on his annulment; the theologian did not approve.
  58. ^ Bernard 1990, p. 185.
  59. ^ MacCulloch 1996, pp. 59–60.
  60. ^ MacCulloch 1996, pp. 70–72.
  61. ^ MacCulloch 1996, pp. 65–66, 153–154.
  62. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 205.
  63. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 208,221.
  64. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 238.
  65. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 215.
  66. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 216–217.
  67. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 140.
  68. ^ Brigden 2000, p. 107: Henry was no innocent: he sought influence in European affairs and, in pursuance of it, his relationship with the French was ambivalent and essentially treacherous.
  69. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 125.
  70. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 254–256.
  71. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 129.
  72. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 241.
  73. ^ a b Haigh 1993, p. 130.
  74. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 241–242.
  75. ^ MacCulloch 2001, p. 57.
  76. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 134.
  77. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 227.
  78. ^ a b Haigh 1993, p. 131.
  79. ^ Marshall 2018, p. 226.
  80. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 141.
  81. ^ a b Smith 1938, p. vii.
  82. ^ a b Elton 1991, p. 142.
  83. ^ Marshall 2018, p. 269.
  84. ^ Marshall 2018, p. 229.
  85. ^ Marshall 2018, p. 232.
  86. ^ Haigh 1993, pp. 144–145.
  87. ^ Haigh 1993, pp. 143–144.
  88. ^ Haigh 1993, pp. 145–146.
  89. ^ Haigh 1993, pp. 147–149.
  90. ^ MacCulloch 2003, p. 201.
  91. ^ Marshall 2018, p. 282.
  92. ^ Mackie 1952, pp. 399–400.
  93. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 266.
  94. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 269–270.
  95. ^ a b Brigden 2000, p. 132.
  96. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 229.
  97. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 231.
  98. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 233.
  99. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 241.
  100. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 153.
  101. ^ Brigden 2000, p. 135.
  102. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 280–281.
  103. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 281.
  104. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 284.
  105. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 158.
  106. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 284.
  107. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 286–287.
  108. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 161.
  109. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 160.
  110. ^ Dickens 1966, p. 103.
  111. ^ Haigh (1993, p. 162) argues that the Litany and Primer were largely traditional devotions and that the popularity of the Primer "suggest a continued vitality in conventional religion". Marshall (2017, pp. 291, 293), however, argues that both the Litany and Primer were reformed in outlook, especially in their reduced emphasis on the invocation of saints. They were successful, he writes, in "taking an old-fashioned form and subverting its traditional purposes". Duffy (2005, pp. 446–447) agrees with Marshall.
  112. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 292.
  113. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 294.
  114. ^ Haigh 1993, pp. 165–166.
  115. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 356.
  116. ^ MacCulloch (1996, pp. 356–357) argues that Cranmer believed that, had he lived, Henry would have pursued a radical iconoclastic policy and a transformation of the mass into a Protestant communion service.
  117. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 166.
  118. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 359.
  119. ^ Haigh 1993, pp. 166–167.
  120. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 291,304: Edward's tutors included the reformers John Cheke, Richard Cox and Roger Ascham.
  121. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 366.
  122. ^ MacCulloch 1999, pp. 35ff.
  123. ^ Haigh 1993, pp. 168–169.
  124. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 305.
  125. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 372.
  126. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 308.
  127. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 309–310.
  128. ^ a b Duffy 2005, p. 450.
  129. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 375.
  130. ^ Duffy 2005, p. 452.
  131. ^ Duffy 2005, p. 451.
  132. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 310.
  133. ^ Duffy 2005, p. 458.
  134. ^ Duffy 2005, pp. 450–454.
  135. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 311.
  136. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 376.
  137. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 377.
  138. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 311–312.
  139. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 422.
  140. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 313.
  141. ^ Duffy 2005, pp. 454–456.
  142. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 171.
  143. ^ Dickens 1989, p. 235.
  144. ^ Duffy 2005, p. 481.
  145. ^ Duffy 2005, p. 481: In Ludlow in Shropshire the parishioners complied with the orders to remove the rood and other images in 1547, and in that same year spent money on making up the canopy to be carried over the Blessed Sacrament on the feast of Corpus Christi.
  146. ^ Haigh 1993, pp. 171–172.
  147. ^ Duffy 2005, p. 490.
  148. ^ Haigh 1993, pp. 1–2.
  149. ^ Graham-Dixon 1996, p. 38.
  150. ^ Duffy 2005, p. 462.
  151. ^ Duffy 2005, p. 457.
  152. ^ a b Marshall 2017, p. 315.
  153. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 384.
  154. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 173.
  155. ^ Duffy 2005, p. 459.
  156. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 322–323.
  157. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 380.
  158. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 386.
  159. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 385.
  160. ^ a b Marshall 2017, p. 324.
  161. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 410.
  162. ^ a b Haigh 1993, p. 174.
  163. ^ a b Marshall 2017, pp. 324–325.
  164. ^ a b c Marshall 2017, p. 325.
  165. ^ a b Duffy 2005, pp. 464–466.
  166. ^ Moorman 1983, p. 27.
  167. ^ Jones et al. 1992, pp. 101–105.
  168. ^ Thompson 1961, pp. 234–236.
  169. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 323.
  170. ^ Duffy 2005, p. 466.
  171. ^ Brigden 2000, p. 185.
  172. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 332–333.
  173. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 334.
  174. ^ a b Haigh 1993, p. 176.
  175. ^ Aston 1993; Loach 1999, p. 187; Hearn 1995, pp. 75–76
  176. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 177–178.
  177. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 338.
  178. ^ a b MacCulloch 1996, p. 459.
  179. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 408.
  180. ^ Duffy 2005, p. 471.
  181. ^ a b c Marshall 2017, p. 339.
  182. ^ Duffy 2005, p. 470.
  183. ^ Haigh 1993, pp. 176–177.
  184. ^ MacCulloch 1996, pp. 460–461.
  185. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 340–341.
  186. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 179.
  187. ^ MacCulloch (1996, pp. 461, 492) quotes Cranmer as explaining "And therefore in the book of the holy communion, we do not pray that the creatures of bread and wine may be the body and blood of Christ; but that they may be to us the body and blood of Christ" and also "I do as plainly speak as I can, that Christ's body and blood be given to us in deed, yet not corporally and carnally, but spiritually and effectually."
  188. ^ Duffy 2005, p. 472.
  189. ^ a b c Marshall 2017, p. 348.
  190. ^ MacCulloch 1996, p. 507.
  191. ^ Duffy 2005, p. 474.
  192. ^ Duffy 2005, p. 475.
  193. ^ Duffy 2005, p. 473.
  194. ^ a b Marshall 2017, p. 320.
  195. ^ Duffy 2005, p. 476.
  196. ^ Duffy 2005, p. 477.
  197. ^ Duffy 2005, pp. 484–485. Among many examples: in Haddenham, Cambridgeshire, a chalice, paten and processional cross were sold and the proceeds devoted to flood defences; in the wealthy Rayleigh parish, £10 worth of plate was sold to pay for the cost of the required reforms—the need to buy a parish chest, Bible and communion table.
  198. ^ Duffy 2005, p. 490: At Long Melford, Sir John Clopton, a patron of the church, bought up many of the images, probably to preserve them.
  199. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 350.
  200. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 352.
  201. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 181.
  202. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 353–354.
  203. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 356–358.
  204. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 183.
  205. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 359.
  206. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 360.
  207. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 363.
  208. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 362–363.
  209. ^ Duffy 2005, p. 479.
  210. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 360, 363.
  211. ^ Ward 1981, p. 229.
  212. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 364.
  213. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 208.
  214. ^ Ward 1981, p. 230.
  215. ^ a b MacCulloch 2003, p. 281.
  216. ^ a b Marshall 2017, p. 390.
  217. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 222.
  218. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 223.
  219. ^ Ward 1981, p. 232.
  220. ^ a b Duffy 2005, p. 526.
  221. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 217.
  222. ^ Haigh 1993, pp. 215, 217.
  223. ^ MacCulloch 2003, p. 214.
  224. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 368.
  225. ^ a b c MacCulloch 2003, p. 282.
  226. ^ a b c MacCulloch 2003, p. 283.
  227. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 227.
  228. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 398–399.
  229. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 216.
  230. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 400.
  231. ^ a b c Haigh 1993, p. 225.
  232. ^ a b Marshall 2017, p. 401.
  233. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 226.
  234. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 402–403.
  235. ^ Dickens 1989, pp. 309f.
  236. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 214.
  237. ^ a b Haigh 1993, p. 215.
  238. ^ a b Haigh 1993, p. 234.
  239. ^ Haigh 1993, pp. 214–215.
  240. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 228.
  241. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 386.
  242. ^ Hargrave 1982, p. 7.
  243. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 390–391.
  244. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 396.
  245. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 394, 396.
  246. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 394.
  247. ^ Roddy 2016, p. 64.
  248. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 408.
  249. ^ Cavill 2013, p. 879.
  250. ^ Hargrave 1982, pp. 7–8.
  251. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 230.
  252. ^ Hargrave 1982, p. 8.
  253. ^ Loades 1989, p. 547.
  254. ^ Hargrave 1982, pp. 9–10.
  255. ^ MacCulloch 2003, pp. 284–285.
  256. ^ Haigh 1993, pp. 235–236.
  257. ^ MacCulloch 2001, p. 24.
  258. ^ Marshall 2017, pp. 419–420.
  259. ^ MacCulloch 2005, p. 89.
  260. ^ Moorman 1973, p. 200.
  261. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 238.
  262. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 419.
  263. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 426.
  264. ^ a b Haigh 1993, p. 239.
  265. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 425.
  266. ^ Marshall 2017, p. 428.
  267. ^ Bray 1994, p. 319.
  268. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 244: She herself retained a cross and candlesticks in her own chapel.
  269. ^ Haigh 1993, pp. 237–241: No bishops voted in favour, two were prevented from voting at all and two other ecclesiastics were absent. The majority were all laymen.
  270. ^ Guy 1988, p. 262.
  271. ^ Jones et al. 1992, p. 316.
  272. ^ Moorman 1983, pp. 74–79.
  273. ^ MacCulloch 2001, p. 142.
  274. ^ MacCulloch 2001, p. 28.
  275. ^ MacCulloch 2001, p. 85.
  276. ^ Moorman 1983, p. 78.
  277. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 245.
  278. ^ MacCulloch 2003, p. 384.
  279. ^ MacCulloch 2003, p. 385.
  280. ^ MacCulloch 2003, p. 387: "John Cant" (Whitgift) was accused of sodomitical relations with the Master of Peterhouse, Cambridge.
  281. ^ MacCulloch 2003, p. 387.
  282. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 253.
  283. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 267.
  284. ^ Haigh (1993, p. 256) argues that the initial impetus for the rebellion was scarcely religious at all, but political; what swelled support, however, was a rejection of the Prayer Book and a desire to restore the Mass.
  285. ^ Haigh 1993, pp. 262f: "...England judicially murdered more Roman Catholics than any other country in Europe."
  286. ^ MacCulloch 2003, p. 392.
  287. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 264.
  288. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 265–267.
  289. ^ Procter, F. & Frere, W. H., A New History of the Book of Common Prayer (Macmillan, 1965) p. 91f.
  290. ^ Maltby 1998.
  291. ^ Froude, History of England from the Fall of Wolsey to the Defeat of the Spanish Armada, (12 volumes, 1893) "Wolsey" online free
  292. ^ R.A.F. Pollard, Henry VIII (1905) online free; Pollard, The History of England from the Accession of Edward VI to the Death of Elizabeth, 1547–1603 (1910) online free.
  293. ^ Vidmar 2005.
  294. ^ Hazlett 1995.
  295. ^ Slavin 1990, pp. 405–431.
  296. ^ Haigh (1997, pp. 281–299) deals with Elton.
  297. ^ A.G. Dickens, John Tonkin, and Kenneth Powell, eds., The Reformation in historical thought (1985).
  298. ^ Richard Cust and Ann Hughes, eds., Conflict in early Stuart England: studies in religion and politics 1603–1642 (Routledge, 2014).
  299. ^ Duffy 2006.

References [ edit ]

Further reading [ edit ]

Historiograpical [ edit ]

Primary sources [ edit ]

  • King, John N., ed. (2004). Voices of the English Reformation: A Sourcebook. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. OCLC 265599728.

External links [ edit ]

What is this?