The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is part of WikiProject British crime, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide on crime in Great Britain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British crimeWikipedia:WikiProject British crimeTemplate:WikiProject British crimeBritish crime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
This article has been marked as needing an image. Once the requested image is added, remove the imageneeded and imagedetails parameters from this template.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, realise, defence, artefact), and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Here. Perhaps this provided too many details, but the content seems to be well sourced and on the subject. What's the problem? My very best wishes (talk) 20:09, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
There was pretty much of a consensus at the ANI discussion that the article included way too much information about the perpetrators - each subsection amounting to a mini-article, detailing every possible bit of information about them. Nobody was willing to spend the hours going through and picking out the occasional relevant bits. If you want to take the trouble to selectively re-add significant information (not the salacious details, please, and no trivia like tattoos or gold teeth) feel free. But please DON'T revert the removal as a whole; that part of article really did need a bulldozer, not a shovel. -- MelanieN (talk) 23:07, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Of course I am not going to revert. Well, the Criminal tattoo are usually significant. Simply as a reader, I can say the text of the old version (before this removal) had to be made much shorter, but it does provide some vivid details (apparently from the sited sources), like "Batley treated women like slaves and could order women to undress and summon children to him simply by clicking his fingers" or " During cult meetings, Batley would read from occult literature, such as The Book of the Law by Aleister Crowley, as a means of brainwashing his victims, then ordered them to have sex on camera". If you think such details should be removed as salacious, I would disagree. Overall, my objection was mostly with regard to the sanctions suggested at the AN. My very best wishes (talk) 23:42, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
After looking more carefully, I would rather leave current version (i.e. after the removal) intact. I think it's OK. If the creator is not topic banned, I would like to see if they will make any changes here. My very best wishes (talk) 02:27, 29 July 2019 (UTC)