Template talk:HKafter1997

(Rated Template-class)

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.

Template

This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (59)

...needing expert attention (7) • ...without infoboxes (249)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (52) • B-Class articles (234)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (681)

Image needed (200)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (4,457) • Stub-Class articles (6,207)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (535) • ...assess the un-Importance (944)

An interesting list of films, maybe you could add additional years and popularity? A history of chinese film production may add depth, or even differences that occur with films from 1993 and 2019. Royo322 (talk) 04:10, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Arroyo

WikiProject China

(Rated Template-class)

	China portal v t e This template is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Template	This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

WikiProject Politics

(Rated Template-class)

	Politics portal v t e This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Template	This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

This template was considered for deletion on 2014 December 15. The result of the discussion was "no consensus".