Template talk:Territorial Authorities of New Zealand
|WikiProject New Zealand / Politics||(Rated Template-class)|
Template state [ edit ]
How do you get this template to display collapsed by default? MadMaxDog 10:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Chatham Islands [ edit ]
The Chatham Islands Territory was grouped with external territories in the Realm of New Zealand. This is extremely misleading. The name Territory as it applies to the Chatham Islands is simply a sui generis category of local authority. The term when applied to an internal division in countries like Australia or the United States implies a much greater level of legal separation than the Chathams have. While the Australian Capital Territory or the District of Columbia constitute distinct legal jurisdictions with their own law-making powers, the Chatham Islands do not. The Chatham Islands Council is not empowered to pass laws, merely bylaws like any other unit of local government.
Contrast this with Niue and the Cook Islands which both have complete law making powers, and for which the New Zealand Government is not empowered to act unilaterally. Contrast it also with the rules that Tokelau's General Fono can pass, and the fact that law passed in New Zealand does not automatically extend to Tokelau. The Ross Dependency constitutes a separate legal system, although laws passed in New Zealand automatically extend to it..
Realm of New Zealand [ edit ]
I separated out the external parts of the realm of New Zealand from the Chatham Islands, but I don't believe these external entities belong in this list. They are not Territorial Authorities and they are not of New Zealand in the sense of being part of the country.
I think we should remove them but that's a slightly bolder move than simply separating out the Chathams, so I've left it for now.
[ edit ]
Given that this template is about territorial authorities, the links should point to the respective district and city councils. Any thoughts before I start adjusting the links? Schwede66 08:53, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- I think that the dependent territories and the associated states should not be in the template. SealMan11 (talk) 18:35, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
[ edit ]
An anon has restructured the navbox to include a regional breakdown; see this version. Ajf773 has reverted it to the simpler layout. I like the inclusion of the regional councils, and in particular that it shows those territorial authorities that cross regional boundaries. What do other editors think? Schwede66 00:02, 29 April 2017 (UTC)